Live data from Hacker News

Alex Jones must pay $50m in punitive damages for Sandy Hook hoax claim

bbc.co.uk

1–10 of 360 posts

Re: Alex Jones must pay $50m in punitive damages for Sandy Hook hoax claim

#2
Ignoring that Jones is a garbage human and just focusing on the case: that isn’t protected free speech? I don’t know all the rules around when speech isn’t protected but the article doesn’t really cover why this wasn’t.

Does this set a precedent that anyone who spouts conspiracy theories about an event is targetable by those who suffered from that event?

Re: Alex Jones must pay $50m in punitive damages for Sandy Hook hoax claim

#3
post #2

Ignoring that Jones is a garbage human and just focusing on the case: that isn’t protected free speech? I don’t know all the rules around when speech isn’t protected but the article doesn’t really cover why this wasn’t. Does this set a precedent that anyone who spouts conspiracy theories about an event is targetable by those who suffered from that event?

The plaintiffs lawyer said is best, "Speech is free, but lies you have to pay for."

Re: Alex Jones must pay $50m in punitive damages for Sandy Hook hoax claim

#4
post #2

Ignoring that Jones is a garbage human and just focusing on the case: that isn’t protected free speech? I don’t know all the rules around when speech isn’t protected but the article doesn’t really cover why this wasn’t. Does this set a precedent that anyone who spouts conspiracy theories about an event is targetable by those who suffered from that event?

[deleted]

Re: Alex Jones must pay $50m in punitive damages for Sandy Hook hoax claim

#5
post #2

Ignoring that Jones is a garbage human and just focusing on the case: that isn’t protected free speech? I don’t know all the rules around when speech isn’t protected but the article doesn’t really cover why this wasn’t. Does this set a precedent that anyone who spouts conspiracy theories about an event is targetable by those who suffered from that event?

Defamation, Slander, etc. None are protected. Free speech protects you from the Government, not your fellow citizens.

Re: Alex Jones must pay $50m in punitive damages for Sandy Hook hoax claim

#6
post #2

Ignoring that Jones is a garbage human and just focusing on the case: that isn’t protected free speech? I don’t know all the rules around when speech isn’t protected but the article doesn’t really cover why this wasn’t. Does this set a precedent that anyone who spouts conspiracy theories about an event is targetable by those who suffered from that event?

[deleted]

Re: Alex Jones must pay $50m in punitive damages for Sandy Hook hoax claim

#9
post #2

Ignoring that Jones is a garbage human and just focusing on the case: that isn’t protected free speech? I don’t know all the rules around when speech isn’t protected but the article doesn’t really cover why this wasn’t. Does this set a precedent that anyone who spouts conspiracy theories about an event is targetable by those who suffered from that event?

I guess free speech that is proveably false is what is at stake here. Conspiracy theories are OK provided they are cannot be proven to be untrue.

Re: Alex Jones must pay $50m in punitive damages for Sandy Hook hoax claim

#10
I'm a supporter of Jones being able to spread whatever insane theories he wants whether or not he believes them himself, but he slandered the parents of dead children to the degree that some of the most insane and aggressive people in the world think that they're the agents of a world conspiracy with the intent to enslave the planet. $50 mil is a light judgement.
Post reply on HN