Be enterprise-ready: reasons not to build enterprise features
1–10 of 40 posts
Re: Be enterprise-ready: reasons not to build enterprise features
#2I was reading an article by the other day about a person who had a disability that caused them to be highly disturbed by meaningless animations on the web.
I might have voted it up but those stupid memes drag this article down to a low level.
Re: Be enterprise-ready: reasons not to build enterprise features
#3I was reading an article by the other day about a person who had a disability that caused them to be highly disturbed by meaningless animations on the web. I might have voted it up but those stupid memes drag this article down to a low level.
I don't know why this is becoming a thing.
Re: Be enterprise-ready: reasons not to build enterprise features
#4I was reading an article by the other day about a person who had a disability that caused them to be highly disturbed by meaningless animations on the web. I might have voted it up but those stupid memes drag this article down to a low level.
Even as someone who's doesn't struggle with them, there's way too many for too little text here. It puts me off reading it and also highly distracting when I'm trying to. I ended up just deleting them from the DOM, they add nothing.
Re: Be enterprise-ready: reasons not to build enterprise features
#5I was reading an article by the other day about a person who had a disability that caused them to be highly disturbed by meaningless animations on the web. I might have voted it up but those stupid memes drag this article down to a low level.
can you share the article, i'm trying to be more littered in disability and this type of article tend to be useful.
Re: Be enterprise-ready: reasons not to build enterprise features
#6This has been my experience, enterprises are routinely one-upping their security requirements.
It used to be Shared Controls Audits, now its SOC2 Type 2, tomorrow it will be HiTrust or combinations of SOC2 and ISO controls.
This has been getting more arduous every year for the last 10 years, I don't see it reversing anytime soon.
As a startup, you will be out of business by the time you meet their requirements, or could have landed other deals.
Re: Be enterprise-ready: reasons not to build enterprise features
#7I was reading an article by the other day about a person who had a disability that caused them to be highly disturbed by meaningless animations on the web. I might have voted it up but those stupid memes drag this article down to a low level.
I don't know why this is becoming a thing.
Maybe they're mimicking messaging apps like Telegram.
Re: Be enterprise-ready: reasons not to build enterprise features
#8This has been my experience, enterprises are routinely one-upping their security requirements. It used to be Shared Controls Audits, now its SOC2 Type 2, tomorrow it will be HiTrust or combinations of SOC2 and ISO controls. This has been getting more arduous every year for the last 10 years, I don't see it reversing anytime soon. As a startup, you will be out of business by the time you meet their requirements, or co…
Reading about SOC2 compliance, as a solo founder it would be impossible for me to get SOC2 compliance because there is just one of me right? Every time I read the requirements it's always: this person for X, this person for Y, this person for Z, which makes it seem like if you don't have a full team working on a project, it's impossible to get SOC2 compliance because there aren't enough people.
Re: Be enterprise-ready: reasons not to build enterprise features
#9I was reading an article by the other day about a person who had a disability that caused them to be highly disturbed by meaningless animations on the web. I might have voted it up but those stupid memes drag this article down to a low level.
I don't know why this is becoming a thing.
It's just another way people say "me too" online.
Re: Be enterprise-ready: reasons not to build enterprise features
#10I was reading an article by the other day about a person who had a disability that caused them to be highly disturbed by meaningless animations on the web. I might have voted it up but those stupid memes drag this article down to a low level.
Not disturbed but got damn a looping gif makes it hard to read the text around said gif (adhd if relevant, idk)