Training my sense of CO2 ppm
interconnected.org
Training my sense of CO2 ppm
1–10 of 98 posts
Re: Training my sense of CO2 ppm
#2Apparently its sneaky and cumulative; a few moments wont do much but as time goes on you get fizzier.
Re: Training my sense of CO2 ppm
#3Now I have a pretty realtime graph and a strong reasoning to air my room more often.
[1] https://www.tfa-dostmann.de/en/product/co2-monitor-airco2ntr...
Re: Training my sense of CO2 ppm
#4I've bought [1] and coupled it with Zabbix using [2]. Now I have a pretty realtime graph and a strong reasoning to air my room more often. [1] https://www.tfa-dostmann.de/en/product/co2-monitor-airco2ntr... [2] https://codeberg.org/pf-monitoring/airco2ntrold
Re: Training my sense of CO2 ppm
#5Re: Training my sense of CO2 ppm
#6It also measures PM10 and PM2,5 which helped me show that my wood furnace is indeed leaking something sometimes when I noticed it smelling weird.
Re: Training my sense of CO2 ppm
#7When I looked into this a few years ago, I couldn't find any accuracy guaranties for CO2 meters marketed for households / greenhouses.
The closest thing I could find were laboratories that could test CO2 meters in chambers with known CO2 concentrations. But IIRC the pricing for those labs was prohibitively expensive.
- There were literally no guaranteed accuracy bounds for the meters I looked at. So they could be off by 3x reality for all I know.
- Their calibration systems relied on an assumed CO2 concentration for outside air. But even if the calibration system ensured that the meter would report the right number for that CO2 concentration, there was no information about how accurate the calibrated meter would be at other CO2 concentrations. Nor information about how the meter's numbers would be off when the CO2 levels observed during calibration differed from the level assumed by the calibration logic.
These limitations might not be a problem for some applications. But they could be an issue when people want to relate their meters' readings to the numbers used in various research publications.
Re: Training my sense of CO2 ppm
#8Re: Training my sense of CO2 ppm
#9I think the elephant in the room is calibration of the CO2 detector. When I looked into this a few years ago, I couldn't find any accuracy guaranties for CO2 meters marketed for households / greenhouses. The closest thing I could find were laboratories that could test CO2 meters in chambers with known CO2 concentrations. But IIRC the pricing for those labs was prohibitively expensive. - There were literally no guaran…
Re: Training my sense of CO2 ppm
#10Is there any kind of CO2 scrubbing that's at all practical for home? I'm curious what the effects would be of going below ambient/outdoor levels, especially since those are rising (if slowly).
A well-sealed, occupied room can build up significant CO2 levels pretty quickly. In my particular case, one person, not exercising, could bring CO2 above 800ppm (reported) in just a few hours.
So I think lack of ventilation causes way, way more excess CO2 than is caused by recent increases in atmospheric CO2. At least in my suburban neighborhood; maybe it's a lot worse in a dense city.