Vite 3.0
vitejs.dev
Vite 3.0
1–10 of 202 posts
Re: Vite 3.0
#2I had no idea so many other frameworks are using Vite as their default. Event server-side frameworks are picking it up!
Has Webpack really been dethroned as the go-to bundler?
Re: Vite 3.0
#3The landing page of Vite claims "Next Generation Frontend Tooling" but then go on to describe features that already have been existing for a good while (multiple years).
What exactly is the "next generation" part here? The composition? That's also not new, so I think I'm either missing something very obvious, or they need to do a better job explaining how Vite is actually different.
Re: Vite 3.0
#4Would love to hear the comparison between snowpack and this.
Re: Vite 3.0
#5Well that sucks. Updated my project and https no longer works :( guess I got to figure out what changed with https mode.
Re: Vite 3.0
#6The landing page of Vite claims "Next Generation Frontend Tooling" but then go on to describe features that already have been existing for a good while (multiple years). What exactly is the "next generation" part here? The composition? That's also not new, so I think I'm either missing something very obvious, or they need to do a better job explaining how Vite is actually different.
Vite is a fast, efficient “bundler” for npm modules. You can run a dev environment and package code for complex, modern frameworks like svelte, vue 3, etc. It is not in itself a “framework” like React.
Re: Vite 3.0
#7Would love to hear the comparison between snowpack and this.
Snowpack is no longer maintained, and the people previously working on it are now developing an SSG tool based on Vite. Source: https://vitejs.dev/guide/comparisons.html#snowpack
Re: Vite 3.0
#8The landing page of Vite claims "Next Generation Frontend Tooling" but then go on to describe features that already have been existing for a good while (multiple years). What exactly is the "next generation" part here? The composition? That's also not new, so I think I'm either missing something very obvious, or they need to do a better job explaining how Vite is actually different.
It's the performance. It's basically Webpack but fast (sub-second rather than multi-second compiles). There's a number of projects competing in this area, and it might be a bit early to call a winner, ut it's looking like it's most likely going to be Vite.
Re: Vite 3.0
#9Why Vite Guide
Re: Vite 3.0
#10Well that sucks. Updated my project and https no longer works :( guess I got to figure out what changed with https mode.