The $8 Trillion Internet: McKinsey's Bold Attempt to Measure the E-conomy
1–8 of 8 posts
Re: The $8 Trillion Internet: McKinsey's Bold Attempt to Measure the E-conomy
#2Pinch of salt. Probably cost a few hundred grand to put together, but still a pinch of salt.
Re: The $8 Trillion Internet: McKinsey's Bold Attempt to Measure the E-conomy
#3"So McKinsey's report limited its scope to the online economy in the G-8 countries plus five more: Brazil, China, India, South Korea and Brazil."
lol
Re: The $8 Trillion Internet: McKinsey's Bold Attempt to Measure the E-conomy
#4I wonder if McKinsey is ever going to realize that they can't measure everything.
Re: The $8 Trillion Internet: McKinsey's Bold Attempt to Measure the E-conomy
#5"So McKinsey's report limited its scope to the online economy in the G-8 countries plus five more: Brazil, China, India, South Korea and Brazil." lol
Why is that funny? If they are assuming a pareto distribution then getting the top 13 countries probably would make the estimate fairly accurate.
Re: The $8 Trillion Internet: McKinsey's Bold Attempt to Measure the E-conomy
#6Heh! They'll turn around and sell this "study" for millions of dollars and will keep the mouths of McKinsey new hires moving for a few hours more.
Re: The $8 Trillion Internet: McKinsey's Bold Attempt to Measure the E-conomy
#7"So McKinsey's report limited its scope to the online economy in the G-8 countries plus five more: Brazil, China, India, South Korea and Brazil." lol
Why is that funny? If they are assuming a pareto distribution then getting the top 13 countries probably would make the estimate fairly accurate.
I think the lol refers to the fact that Brazil is counted twice.
Re: The $8 Trillion Internet: McKinsey's Bold Attempt to Measure the E-conomy
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why is that funny? If they are assuming a pareto distribution then getting the top 13 countries probably would make the estimate fairly accurate.
I think the lol refers to the fact that Brazil is counted twice.
Ah, yep. The jokes on me:) I missed that.