St. John's woman loses home after Phoenix pay fiasco
1–10 of 25 posts
Re: St. John's woman loses home after Phoenix pay fiasco
#2Re: St. John's woman loses home after Phoenix pay fiasco
#3Re: St. John's woman loses home after Phoenix pay fiasco
#4I'm confused about why she stayed? It doesn't say she ever got any money back. I would be gone after the first 0$ check, why would you stay after that?
Plus I’m guessing she was on a defined benefit pension, creating an incentive to stay.
Re: St. John's woman loses home after Phoenix pay fiasco
#5Re: St. John's woman loses home after Phoenix pay fiasco
#6I'm confused about why she stayed? It doesn't say she ever got any money back. I would be gone after the first 0$ check, why would you stay after that?
Re: St. John's woman loses home after Phoenix pay fiasco
#7I'm confused about why she stayed? It doesn't say she ever got any money back. I would be gone after the first 0$ check, why would you stay after that?
Re: St. John's woman loses home after Phoenix pay fiasco
#8I'm confused why the union or whoever can't sue the government on their behalf. Or some lawyer takes on a bunch of their cases if it's 200k people affected.
Re: St. John's woman loses home after Phoenix pay fiasco
#9I'm confused about why she stayed? It doesn't say she ever got any money back. I would be gone after the first 0$ check, why would you stay after that?
I'm sure if she had options for other employment, she would have taken them. Even when working for CRA, she was only a seasonal contractor.