Docker is dead? Podman – an alternative tool?
content.fme.de
Docker is dead? Podman – an alternative tool?
1–10 of 183 posts
Re: Docker is dead? Podman – an alternative tool?
#2Re: Docker is dead? Podman – an alternative tool?
#3Lack of mention of podman machine seems like big miss when talking about podman as an alternative to Docker.
https://github.com/lima-vm/lima
If memory serves me right, it works with Podman.
Re: Docker is dead? Podman – an alternative tool?
#4Re: Docker is dead? Podman – an alternative tool?
#5Re: Docker is dead? Podman – an alternative tool?
#6Half the time you're jamming it into some cloud service anyway where you have no idea what GCP/fly/aws is using under the hood to actually run it.
Meaning this discussion is more relevant to the self-hosted context. In which case I'd say containerization isn't really security. So in my mind that residual risk of the daemon being root is inconsequential. (Or if not use a VM).
Re: Docker is dead? Podman – an alternative tool?
#7Re: Docker is dead? Podman – an alternative tool?
#8I think Docker folks are heavily focused on providing great local development experiences, which is a niche few other products are covering.
Re: Docker is dead? Podman – an alternative tool?
#9docker is far far far far from dead. I frankly do not seeing it going away for a looong time because it is generally a great and well supported product. Theres lots of information on issues and fixes and tons of developers using in across many large corporations
Re: Docker is dead? Podman – an alternative tool?
#10That being said, docker blows. Docker desktop blows more. Docker desktop on Windows blows the most. I always get stuck with a bind mount misbehaving, or some other issue that requires me to wipe the docker desktop data to fix it. Just use docker compose for simple stuff, and stay away from docker for Windows if possible.