Algorithmic stablecoins are provably impossible without continuous funding
fragileequilibrium.substack.com
Algorithmic stablecoins are provably impossible without continuous funding
1–10 of 264 posts
Re: Algorithmic stablecoins are provably impossible without continuous funding
#2Definitely not a “proof” in the logical sense.
Likely the Vitalik post linked in this article will have some insight.
Re: Algorithmic stablecoins are provably impossible without continuous funding
#3A lot of finacial theory jargon here but not a very clear explanation. Definitely not a “proof” in the logical sense. Likely the Vitalik post linked in this article will have some insight.
> While there are plenty of automated stablecoin designs that are fundamentally flawed and doomed to collapse eventually, and plenty more that can survive theoretically but are highly risky, there are also many stablecoins that are highly robust in theory, and have survived extreme tests of crypto market conditions in practice. Hence, what we need is not stablecoin boosterism or stablecoin doomerism, but rather a return to principles-based thinking.
Re: Algorithmic stablecoins are provably impossible without continuous funding
#4Re: Algorithmic stablecoins are provably impossible without continuous funding
#5Re: Algorithmic stablecoins are provably impossible without continuous funding
#6Analysis aside, common sense suggests that it is very difficult if not impossible to manufacture long term stability in any system based mostly on speculation with limited hard assets to back it up.
Re: Algorithmic stablecoins are provably impossible without continuous funding
#7Re: Algorithmic stablecoins are provably impossible without continuous funding
#8Analysis aside, common sense suggests that it is very difficult if not impossible to manufacture long term stability in any system based mostly on speculation with limited hard assets to back it up.
Scalable, self-similar, clustering, and long memory are some of the characteristics of the fractal-style randomness of financial markets. Thus, build in safety factors, multiple redundancies, hedges, etc. with those characteristics in mind.
Re: Algorithmic stablecoins are provably impossible without continuous funding
#9A lot of finacial theory jargon here but not a very clear explanation. Definitely not a “proof” in the logical sense. Likely the Vitalik post linked in this article will have some insight.
Vitalik says: > While there are plenty of automated stablecoin designs that are fundamentally flawed and doomed to collapse eventually, and plenty more that can survive theoretically but are highly risky, there are also many stablecoins that are highly robust in theory, and have survived extreme tests of crypto market conditions in practice. Hence, what we need is not stablecoin boosterism or stablecoin doomerism, bu…
Re: Algorithmic stablecoins are provably impossible without continuous funding
#10Not a crypto fan but I'm beginning to see that our entire economy is proving impossible without continuous manipulation by the fed