Live data from Hacker News

How did Tropicana lose $30M in a packaging redesign?

bootcamp.uxdesign.cc

1–10 of 278 posts

Re: How did Tropicana lose $30M in a packaging redesign?

#4
post #2

It is my theory, backed up by nothing but instinct and my own very fallible personal experience, that many customers simply did not “see“ the new design. That is, they would have preferred to buy Tropicana but assumed it had disappeared from the shelves.

I think you're spot on. The older design shouts out "TROPICANA"; it's bad enough they removed the iconic orange from the new design, but you have to tilt your head 90 degrees to even read the logo.

Re: How did Tropicana lose $30M in a packaging redesign?

#7
post #2

It is my theory, backed up by nothing but instinct and my own very fallible personal experience, that many customers simply did not “see“ the new design. That is, they would have preferred to buy Tropicana but assumed it had disappeared from the shelves.

I'm inclined to agree. The article's talk about "resonating" with the audience is wishy-washy, and seems far-fetched for accounting for a 20% decrease in sales.

On the other hand, a UX design tenet is to test, not assume. Just because it sounds right doesn't mean it's the correct explanation (that goes for both TFA and alternative theories).

Re: How did Tropicana lose $30M in a packaging redesign?

#10
post #8
post #3

Obligatory XKCD: https://xkcd.com/993/

This is essentially the "No Name" brand in Canada. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Name_(brand)

This used to exist in the US as well:

http://gbnfgroceries.blogspot.com/2014/01/from-misc-foods-ai...

I remember these being an entire aisle in the grocery store in the 80s. I think they've been replaced by store brands with more colorful packaging

Post reply on HN