Live data from Hacker News

Apple employees criticize work-from-home policy in open letter

engadget.com

1–10 of 632 posts

Re: Apple employees criticize work-from-home policy in open letter

#2
Perhaps the most compelling argument was that Apple was being hypocritical in the way it markets its own products. "We tell all of our customers how great our products are for remote work, yet, we ourselves, cannot use them to work remotely?" the letter states.

Re: Apple employees criticize work-from-home policy in open letter

#3

Perhaps the most compelling argument was that Apple was being hypocritical in the way it markets its own products. "We tell all of our customers how great our products are for remote work, yet, we ourselves, cannot use them to work remotely?" the letter states.

i don't see how thats hypocritical though.

Re: Apple employees criticize work-from-home policy in open letter

#4
post #3

Perhaps the most compelling argument was that Apple was being hypocritical in the way it markets its own products. "We tell all of our customers how great our products are for remote work, yet, we ourselves, cannot use them to work remotely?" the letter states.

i don't see how thats hypocritical though.

The full quote:

> We tell all of our customers how great our products are for remote work, yet, we ourselves, cannot use them to work remotely? How can we expect our customers to take that seriously? How can we understand what problems of remote work need solving in our products if we don't live it?

I'd have to agree. If you're building products and market them for "remote working", then you better have figured out remote working yourself in your own environment, otherwise I won't trust that you've actually gotten it right.

Of course, there is also a difference between different job functions. If you're in the hardware team, I can see how it's hard to actually collaborate remotely on a bunch of stuff. But for the pencil pushers in corporate? Definitely should have figured out how to make that work.

Re: Apple employees criticize work-from-home policy in open letter

#5
post #3

Perhaps the most compelling argument was that Apple was being hypocritical in the way it markets its own products. "We tell all of our customers how great our products are for remote work, yet, we ourselves, cannot use them to work remotely?" the letter states.

i don't see how thats hypocritical though.

There’s a big difference between what’s needed to design and build something and what’s needed to use something. I hope Tim Cook fires all these whiners.

Re: Apple employees criticize work-from-home policy in open letter

#7
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

i don't see how thats hypocritical though.

There’s a big difference between what’s needed to design and build something and what’s needed to use something. I hope Tim Cook fires all these whiners.

No post body was provided.

Re: Apple employees criticize work-from-home policy in open letter

#8
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

i don't see how thats hypocritical though.

The full quote: > We tell all of our customers how great our products are for remote work, yet, we ourselves, cannot use them to work remotely? How can we expect our customers to take that seriously? How can we understand what problems of remote work need solving in our products if we don't live it? I'd have to agree. If you're building products and market them for "remote working", then you better have figured out r…

Just because a tool is great for working remotely does not mean remote working is good.

Turkey marketing its drones as great for war does not mean Turkey is being hypocritical for saying that war isn’t good.

Re: Apple employees criticize work-from-home policy in open letter

#9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The full quote: > We tell all of our customers how great our products are for remote work, yet, we ourselves, cannot use them to work remotely? How can we expect our customers to take that seriously? How can we understand what problems of remote work need solving in our products if we don't live it? I'd have to agree. If you're building products and market them for "remote working", then you better have figured out r…

Just because a tool is great for working remotely does not mean remote working is good. Turkey marketing its drones as great for war does not mean Turkey is being hypocritical for saying that war isn’t good.

> Just because a tool is great for working remotely does not mean remote working is good.

So lets say Apple doesn't believe "remote working" is good in general. Why would they be building tools for something they don't think is good?

Post reply on HN