Ask HN: Who here is juggling two or more remote jobs? How is it working out?
1–10 of 220 posts
Re: Ask HN: Who here is juggling two or more remote jobs? How is it working out?
#2Re: Ask HN: Who here is juggling two or more remote jobs? How is it working out?
#3Re: Ask HN: Who here is juggling two or more remote jobs? How is it working out?
#4Re: Ask HN: Who here is juggling two or more remote jobs? How is it working out?
#5Re: Ask HN: Who here is juggling two or more remote jobs? How is it working out?
#6Re: Ask HN: Who here is juggling two or more remote jobs? How is it working out?
#7I wonder how the legalities of working more than 1 (remote) job are. You'd think you'd run into some conflicting clauses in your employment contracts.
Part of the reason for managers to start pushing for return to office since its harder to cheat this way from office.
Re: Ask HN: Who here is juggling two or more remote jobs? How is it working out?
#8If you're working > 50 hours a week (or whatever your personal limit is) for more than 1-2 months -- that won't end well for your health or business relationships, either.
That's the score, basically.
Re: Ask HN: Who here is juggling two or more remote jobs? How is it working out?
#9I work contract so I’m not hiding it from anyone. I juggle two clients simultaneously by design (it buffers me in case a contract ends). I’ve currently got four active clients and a compelling side-project (I also have 3 colleagues helping with those things). Keeping it all straight is a challenge. I lean heavily on my calendar and I take extensive notes. I have low patience for things taking longer than they should.…
not juggling multiple "jobs" but still juggling a lot. i thought perhaps my memory was/is deteriorating... perhaps this is the reason!?
Re: Ask HN: Who here is juggling two or more remote jobs? How is it working out?
#10I wonder how the legalities of working more than 1 (remote) job are. You'd think you'd run into some conflicting clauses in your employment contracts.
Nobody should ever think in absolutes regarding these topics, only consequences, specifically the value of those consequences.
Of course consequentialism is a two way street, like, is a potential $100 fine because an employer asked a personal question in an interview a deterrent?
For an employee though, the stakes are technically way higher, but do you want that $3 million house or not.