H.264 is Magic (2016)
sidbala.com
H.264 is Magic (2016)
1–10 of 229 posts
Re: H.264 is Magic (2016)
#2However, most video is YUV, which is typically 1.5 bytes/pixel.
Re: H.264 is Magic (2016)
#3* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Efficiency_Video_Coding
And now even H.266:
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Versatile_Video_Coding
Also, at what point will AV1 become "mainstream"? How prevalent is it? Still seems that hardware decoding (never mind encoding) support is still only so-so.
Re: H.264 is Magic (2016)
#4Re: H.264 is Magic (2016)
#5Re: H.264 is Magic (2016)
#6The article starts off with talking about "raw" video containing 3 bytes for every pixel. However, most video is YUV, which is typically 1.5 bytes/pixel. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YUV
Re: H.264 is Magic (2016)
#7The article starts off with talking about "raw" video containing 3 bytes for every pixel. However, most video is YUV, which is typically 1.5 bytes/pixel. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YUV
Re: H.264 is Magic (2016)
#8Scoooped: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30686148 ;) ;p xx ;p
Re: H.264 is Magic (2016)
#9See also H.265: * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Efficiency_Video_Coding And now even H.266: * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Versatile_Video_Coding Also, at what point will AV1 become "mainstream"? How prevalent is it? Still seems that hardware decoding (never mind encoding) support is still only so-so.
Re: H.264 is Magic (2016)
#10Here is a side-by-side visual comparison: http://xooyoozoo.github.io/yolo-octo-bugfixes/#ballet-exerci...
Amazing.
I ported his BPG decoder to Android ARM for a pornographic app. See my comment history for details. It reduced data transfer by more than 60%.