Live data from Hacker News

Performative Conservatives Are Mad That DDG Wants to Downrank Disinformation

techdirt.com

1–6 of 6 posts

Re: Performative Conservatives Are Mad That DDG Wants to Downrank Disinformation

#2
This headline and article is needlessly inflammatory. It looks like the ones dropping DDG have a good point: DDG has betrayed one of its values of being unbiased. People switched away from Google because it was openly biased, now DDG is, too. Maybe I should switch away, too?

Re: Performative Conservatives Are Mad That DDG Wants to Downrank Disinformation

#5

This headline and article is needlessly inflammatory. It looks like the ones dropping DDG have a good point: DDG has betrayed one of its values of being unbiased. People switched away from Google because it was openly biased, now DDG is, too. Maybe I should switch away, too?

What does unbiased even mean? Certainly the goal of a search engine isn't to provide a uniformly random sampling of their index for each and every query. The results must be expected to be biased in some way.

Re: Performative Conservatives Are Mad That DDG Wants to Downrank Disinformation

#6
post #5

This headline and article is needlessly inflammatory. It looks like the ones dropping DDG have a good point: DDG has betrayed one of its values of being unbiased. People switched away from Google because it was openly biased, now DDG is, too. Maybe I should switch away, too?

What does unbiased even mean? Certainly the goal of a search engine isn't to provide a uniformly random sampling of their index for each and every query. The results must be expected to be biased in some way.

A search engine will rank results, yes, but that's not bias. But when someone who owns or built it changes it due to their political views, that's bias.