Hi, I'm a middle schooler who's new to coding websites. I just started using GitHub and MkDocs. I'm using those websites to create my first site, which I hope will turn out well. I want my website to look really slick and interesting. I'm wondering if MkDocs is really worth using to build static sites.
Is it a good decision to use MkDocs for building static sites?
1–7 of 7 posts
Re: Is it a good decision to use MkDocs for building static sites?
#2MkDocs is more for documentation, but sure you can use it for a static site. However, you may want to compare it to something like Hugo which is more geared towards general site creation.
Re: Is it a good decision to use MkDocs for building static sites?
#3MkDocs is more for documentation, but sure you can use it for a static site. However, you may want to compare it to something like Hugo which is more geared towards general site creation.
I'm just trying to make a simple website for release notes and host it on GitHub. Thanks for your feedback!
Re: Is it a good decision to use MkDocs for building static sites?
#4Yes, MkDocs is a decent option for hosting static sites on GitHub.
Re: Is it a good decision to use MkDocs for building static sites?
#5MkDocs is more for documentation, but sure you can use it for a static site. However, you may want to compare it to something like Hugo which is more geared towards general site creation.
I'm just trying to make a simple website for release notes and host it on GitHub. Thanks for your feedback!
In that case, checkout mdbook as well.
Re: Is it a good decision to use MkDocs for building static sites?
#6Re: Is it a good decision to use MkDocs for building static sites?
#7Yes, MkDocs is a decent option for hosting static sites on GitHub.
Thanks for your feedback! :D