Live data from Hacker News

Is it time to remove reiserfs?

lkml.org

1–10 of 260 posts

Re: Is it time to remove reiserfs?

#4
post #2

Quoted post unavailable.

I'm not seeing the snark in the email? Reiser was infamous for murdering his wife, and I'm guessing Wilcox doesn't want the discussion derailed by Reiser's sordid history.

>Does reiserfs still have a large install base that is just very happy with an old stable filesystem? Or have all its users migrated to new and exciting filesystems with active feature development?

Re: Is it time to remove reiserfs?

#6
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not seeing the snark in the email? Reiser was infamous for murdering his wife, and I'm guessing Wilcox doesn't want the discussion derailed by Reiser's sordid history.

>Does reiserfs still have a large install base that is just very happy with an old stable filesystem? Or have all its users migrated to new and exciting filesystems with active feature development?

That's... not snark?

Re: Is it time to remove reiserfs?

#7
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not seeing the snark in the email? Reiser was infamous for murdering his wife, and I'm guessing Wilcox doesn't want the discussion derailed by Reiser's sordid history.

>Does reiserfs still have a large install base that is just very happy with an old stable filesystem? Or have all its users migrated to new and exciting filesystems with active feature development?

Can you point out what you think is snarky there?

Re: Is it time to remove reiserfs?

#10
ReiserFS does have its benefits in highly specific use-cases.

I have a filesystem with an absurd number of tiny files in it. I host a statically rendered wikipedia mirror. Tens of millions of gzipped html-files with a filesize in the range 1-5 Kb.

ReiserFS is the only filesystem I know that deals even the slightest bit gracefully with this thanks to tail-packing.

Post reply on HN