RF Solid-State Cooking
gojifoodsolutions.com
RF Solid-State Cooking
1–10 of 16 posts
Re: RF Solid-State Cooking
#2Re: RF Solid-State Cooking
#3Re: RF Solid-State Cooking
#4They avoid using the word microwave anywhere in the marketing material, which really is telling they're mostly trying to get rid of the 'low quality food' reputation that microwaves have.
Re: RF Solid-State Cooking
#5Re: RF Solid-State Cooking
#6I don't know how much people would buy this, but I'm pretty sure a lot of restaurants would have one of this if they deliver what they promise.
Re: RF Solid-State Cooking
#7Magnetrons require quite large magnets, a vacuum and filament which eventually burns out, and a large transformer with a lot of copper and steel.
The solid state solution is just a bunch of mosfets. Less material means it'll be cheaper eventually when the patents etc. run out.
Re: RF Solid-State Cooking
#8This is actually a lot more sophisticated than the comments here are making it out to be. With something like this you can basically get software defined cooking. If you combine it with computer vision and a bit of chemistry, you would get a perfect medium rare steak every time. (You don't need the computer vision part if you can get the RF feedback from the sensors directly) To be fair, there is nothing stopping you…
Re: RF Solid-State Cooking
#9This tech will soon enough get cheaper than classic magnetrons. Magnetrons require quite large magnets, a vacuum and filament which eventually burns out, and a large transformer with a lot of copper and steel. The solid state solution is just a bunch of mosfets. Less material means it'll be cheaper eventually when the patents etc. run out.
One advantage is if you can direct the RF energy you could cook TV Dinner and Airline meals without over or under cooking. Could use machine vision and bar code to select the program.
Also wouldn't need a rotating plate.