OneNDA – We've Standardised the NDA
onenda.org
OneNDA – We've Standardised the NDA
1–10 of 41 posts
Re: OneNDA – We've Standardised the NDA
#2Title probably meant to say OneNDA…
Re: OneNDA – We've Standardised the NDA
#3Title? Probably should be
"OneNDA - We've Standardised the NDA"
Re: OneNDA – We've Standardised the NDA
#4Typo in the headline: s/DNA/NDA/
You might still be within the edit window, I don’t remember how long it is
Re: OneNDA – We've Standardised the NDA
#5Title probably meant to say OneNDA…
No post body was provided.
Re: OneNDA – We've Standardised the NDA
#6The url is OneNDA and the title typed here is OneDNA, perhaps this bodes poorly for how memorable/repeatable the name is.
Re: OneNDA – We've Standardised the NDA
#7Typo in the headline: s/DNA/NDA/ You might still be within the edit window, I don’t remember how long it is
No post body was provided.
Re: OneNDA – We've Standardised the NDA
#8The url is OneNDA and the title typed here is OneDNA, perhaps this bodes poorly for how memorable/repeatable the name is.
No post body was provided.
Re: OneNDA – We've Standardised the NDA
#9[deleted]
Re: OneNDA – We've Standardised the NDA
#10I spent quite a while looking for a link from which to git-clone and never found one.
It is advertised as We’ve created a crowd-sourced, open-source standard NDA that companies can adopt as their own.
The desire to trademark the name makes sense, so that "oneNDA" can mean something, but to reap the true benefit of the crowd, CC-BY-SA would be a much better fit than the present CC-BY-ND, no?