How bad is QWERTY, really? A review of the literature, such as it is
erichgrunewald.com
How bad is QWERTY, really? A review of the literature, such as it is
1–10 of 148 posts
Re: How bad is QWERTY, really? A review of the literature, such as it is
#2Type with your hands at an angle, and your wrists inline with your arms and palms. Problem solved.
Re: How bad is QWERTY, really? A review of the literature, such as it is
#3I generally agree with this. I've found that I have less wrist pain now that (1) I've gotten a better mouse and (2) I work out my wrists and forearm occasionally. I think the keyboard is a much smaller cause, especially since a lot of repetitive stress comes more from gaming and use of mice for me.
Re: How bad is QWERTY, really? A review of the literature, such as it is
#4Re: How bad is QWERTY, really? A review of the literature, such as it is
#5The problem of RSI isn't QWERTY, the problem is putting all your fingers on the home row. Type with your hands at an angle, and your wrists inline with your arms and palms. Problem solved.
Re: How bad is QWERTY, really? A review of the literature, such as it is
#6The problem of RSI isn't QWERTY, the problem is putting all your fingers on the home row. Type with your hands at an angle, and your wrists inline with your arms and palms. Problem solved.
Re: How bad is QWERTY, really? A review of the literature, such as it is
#7The problem of RSI isn't QWERTY, the problem is putting all your fingers on the home row. Type with your hands at an angle, and your wrists inline with your arms and palms. Problem solved.
Re: How bad is QWERTY, really? A review of the literature, such as it is
#8Has anyone explored the effects of duplicating keys across hands?
Re: How bad is QWERTY, really? A review of the literature, such as it is
#9That said, switching was a huge pain in the ass.... like horrible for the first two months, and i promised myself i'd keep typing in both. However, i eventually lost the ability to type in qwerty, after about two years, but i honestly don't care, i genuinely love Dvorak.
The biggest concern most people probably don't think about is keeping shortcuts like CTRL+X/C/V/S/F, which apple thankfully has a layout for "Dvorak-CMD-Qwerty." The shortcuts are very obviously put where they are so you can toggle them quickly. Many programs don't account for this layout, which is why I wrote an Intellij IDE key mapping for it: https://github.com/scoofy/Intellij-IDEA-Dvorak-QwertyCMD-key...
The layouts that i think don't get enough love, are the one-handed dvorak layouts designed for amputees.
The idea that, in the end, the author suggests yet another standard seems a bit absurd to me.
Re: How bad is QWERTY, really? A review of the literature, such as it is
#10The problem of RSI isn't QWERTY, the problem is putting all your fingers on the home row. Type with your hands at an angle, and your wrists inline with your arms and palms. Problem solved.
Not at all! RSI is complex because it can involve a hundred muscles and tendons. People can have inflammation and pain even in wrists, shoulders and elbows due to keyboard use.
Reducing finger travel by using Dvorak can be very beneficial. Obviously it will do little for things like ulnar pronation.