Sci Hub Injector
github.com
Sci Hub Injector
1–10 of 45 posts
Re: Sci Hub Injector
#2There’s also this [0] userscript that does essentially the same thing but doesn’t need a separate extension assuming you already use a userscript manager. It also supports far more domains from the looks of it.
Re: Sci Hub Injector
#3Did this get rejected from the Chrome Store? Would've been more convenient.
Re: Sci Hub Injector
#4You can also use a one line JS bookmarklet on the article page, such as the following:
javascript:(function(){window.location = 'http://' + window.location.hostname + '.sci-hub.st' + window.location.pathname;})();
Re: Sci Hub Injector
#5AutHotKey and opening SciHub links on Windows: https://www.hillelwayne.com/post/ahk/
Re: Sci Hub Injector
#6You can also use a one line JS bookmarklet on the article page, such as the following: javascript:(function(){window.location = ' http:// ' + window.location.hostname + '.sci-hub.st' + window.location.pathname;})();
Another one that works:
javascript:window.location='http://sci-hub.st/'+window.location
(scihub detects most academic websites)Re: Sci Hub Injector
#7My main problem with sci-hub right now is that it's stopped adding new content to the website since like 1 or 2 years. Which means if you want to have an up-to-date state of the art, you can't use sci-hub. I personally use the bookmarklet, i'm way more inclined towards this than some random browser extension.
Re: Sci Hub Injector
#8This post and the four (4) comments suggesting alternate methods to do this are a pretty good indicator that pirating papers is still by far the easier method than going through official channels.
I think it would be marginally quicker for me to access a paper legally if I was on my uni's campus. But I am WFH from the other side of the country and would need to log into the VPN. Sci-hub with one of these solutions would be much quicker!
Re: Sci Hub Injector
#9A simple bookmarklet is more than enough for me...
Re: Sci Hub Injector
#10Did this get rejected from the Chrome Store? Would've been more convenient.
Author here! It’s currently in review for Firefox and if that passes I’ll submit it to chrome as well.