The Great Siberian Thaw
newyorker.com
The Great Siberian Thaw
1–10 of 104 posts
Re: The Great Siberian Thaw
#2Re: The Great Siberian Thaw
#3Re: The Great Siberian Thaw
#4https://archive.md/RT1X3
Re: The Great Siberian Thaw
#5For more on the human angle, see this piece, which includes a fascinating video:
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/04/pleisto...
Re: The Great Siberian Thaw
#6Any big change like this would seem to me to hint at some large effects later on. In Russia alone, the changes have the potential to be huge.
I guess it is still kind of "New Year" and people are hunkered down with COVID all over the world.
Re: The Great Siberian Thaw
#7Re: The Great Siberian Thaw
#8I wonder how much of the land is going to become farmable now
Re: The Great Siberian Thaw
#9"As levels of carbon dioxide rose from 550ppm to 945ppm to 1400ppm, subjects’ scores under most headings declined substantially. (Problem-solving ability also seemed to suffer as levels of volatile organic compounds rose.)"
"2,000-5,000 ppm: level associated with headaches, sleepiness, and stagnant, stale, stuffy air; poor concentration, loss of attention, increased heart rate and slight nausea may also be present. > 5,000 ppm: This indicates unusual air conditions where high levels of other gases also could be present."
"Based on preliminary analysis, the global average atmospheric carbon dioxide in 2020 was 412.5 parts per million (ppm for short), setting a new record high amount despite the economic slowdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic."
hmm