Google owns TLDs: .web .meme and .lol
icannwiki.org
Google owns TLDs: .web .meme and .lol
1–10 of 94 posts
Re: Google owns TLDs: .web .meme and .lol
#2They also have .new, enabling links like https://sheets.new.
Re: Google owns TLDs: .web .meme and .lol
#3The list of all their owned TLDs are at [0]. There is an icannwiki page with all the ones they’ve applied for, but not just the ones they currently own.
0: https://ntldstats.com/registry/Charleston-Road-Registry-Inc
Re: Google owns TLDs: .web .meme and .lol
#4They also have .new, enabling links like https://sheets.new .
More details: https://whats.new/
Re: Google owns TLDs: .web .meme and .lol
#5And .dev, which IIRC they were not going to make public but then did. And requires SSL
Re: Google owns TLDs: .web .meme and .lol
#6Re: Google owns TLDs: .web .meme and .lol
#7The list of all their owned TLDs are at [0]. There is an icannwiki page with all the ones they’ve applied for, but not just the ones they currently own. 0: https://ntldstats.com/registry/Charleston-Road-Registry-Inc
How can a commercial company own a top level domain like ".app"? I get that they own .youtube or .google but isn't that way too generic? Like a company owning the copyright for the word "Company"?
Re: Google owns TLDs: .web .meme and .lol
#8If ICANN wasn't just a giant extortion racket they would have yanked this from Google squatting on it years ago - clearly they haven't actually met any of the listed goals considering they have never used the TLD (or opened them for general availability like their original application implies).
In reality all ICANN cares about is $$$
Re: Google owns TLDs: .web .meme and .lol
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
More details: https://whats.new/
That looks awful as a concept. I hope it doesn’t get any traction.
Some of these are pretty pretentious and it means one company can claim the 2ld for their industry, eg https://story.new and https://repo.new
Re: Google owns TLDs: .web .meme and .lol
#10In a sense, dangerous. Google has a history of (and currently practices) censoring viewpoints it disagrees with. Will its censorship reach extend from omitting / deprioritizing search results to entirely canceling those using its TLDs that it deems undesirable?