Alibaba researchers went rogue and disclosed Log4j now CCP is making Alibaba pay
1–10 of 15 posts
Re: Alibaba researchers went rogue and disclosed Log4j now CCP is making Alibaba pay
#2Re: Alibaba researchers went rogue and disclosed Log4j now CCP is making Alibaba pay
#3The HN link links to a twitter post that links to the above link.
Re: Alibaba researchers went rogue and disclosed Log4j now CCP is making Alibaba pay
#4Now I read they have to give it to the government first.
Big difference. Which is the truth and how do we know?
Re: Alibaba researchers went rogue and disclosed Log4j now CCP is making Alibaba pay
#5I read recently Chinese law required them to disclose the bug to the government within two days of disclosing it to vendor and that's why Alibaba was punished. Now I read they have to give it to the government first. Big difference. Which is the truth and how do we know?
Re: Alibaba researchers went rogue and disclosed Log4j now CCP is making Alibaba pay
#6Re: Alibaba researchers went rogue and disclosed Log4j now CCP is making Alibaba pay
#7There's no suggestion that China gets any first say on 0-days. The law in question re reporting is at http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2021/content_5641351.htm and states that you must immediately notify vendors of security flaws, and then the MIIT within 2 days.
Re: Alibaba researchers went rogue and disclosed Log4j now CCP is making Alibaba pay
#8I read recently Chinese law required them to disclose the bug to the government within two days of disclosing it to vendor and that's why Alibaba was punished. Now I read they have to give it to the government first. Big difference. Which is the truth and how do we know?
All of this was already discussed yesterday: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29658977
Re: Alibaba researchers went rogue and disclosed Log4j now CCP is making Alibaba pay
#9Putting Alibaba in the corner for 6 months is an incredibly petty response, but no surprise at all.
Re: Alibaba researchers went rogue and disclosed Log4j now CCP is making Alibaba pay
#10A misleading and inflammatory dupe of https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29658342 .
There is nothing misleading or inflammatory