Google Drive may restrict files identified as violating ToS
workspaceupdates.googleblog.com
Google Drive may restrict files identified as violating ToS
1–10 of 269 posts
Re: Google Drive may restrict files identified as violating ToS
#2Conversely, the information for how to report what you perceive as a ToS violation is far more complete: https://support.google.com/docs/answer/2463296
Re: Google Drive may restrict files identified as violating ToS
#3Re: Google Drive may restrict files identified as violating ToS
#4Any cloud service can change their Terms of Service without notice, and those changes are almost always detrimental to customers.
Seriously, move your saved data in-house. Cloud drives are for ignorant consumers.
Re: Google Drive may restrict files identified as violating ToS
#5Depending on your jurisdiction, small claim courts can actually shut down the binding arbitration clause.
In Canada, Google had a long history of losing by defaults in small claims
Re: Google Drive may restrict files identified as violating ToS
#6If you use anything on a commercial basis with Google, go to small claims court without hesitation, and pull the answer from them rather than keep paying them to lawyertroll you on your own money. Depending on your jurisdiction, small claim courts can actually shut down the binding arbitration clause. In Canada, Google had a long history of losing by defaults in small claims
Re: Google Drive may restrict files identified as violating ToS
#7If you use anything on a commercial basis with Google, go to small claims court without hesitation, and pull the answer from them rather than keep paying them to lawyertroll you on your own money. Depending on your jurisdiction, small claim courts can actually shut down the binding arbitration clause. In Canada, Google had a long history of losing by defaults in small claims
If you do this though; be prepared to lose access to everything you have in Google.
Re: Google Drive may restrict files identified as violating ToS
#8Re: Google Drive may restrict files identified as violating ToS
#9The only change here is end-users will be explicitly notified (and can theoretically contest the decision).