Highlights of the HTTP Archive Web Almanac 2021
stefanjudis.com
Highlights of the HTTP Archive Web Almanac 2021
1–8 of 8 posts
Re: Highlights of the HTTP Archive Web Almanac 2021
#2My impression of today's web, greater in css/js size, but with reduced creativity.
Re: Highlights of the HTTP Archive Web Almanac 2021
#3My impression of today's web, greater in css/js size, but with reduced creativity.
It is the same with other software. Why bother thinking and testing ?
Re: Highlights of the HTTP Archive Web Almanac 2021
#4> 70% of font-size declarations are in pixels.
And all websites must be either scale up or down.
Re: Highlights of the HTTP Archive Web Almanac 2021
#5My impression of today's web, greater in css/js size, but with reduced creativity.
100% agreed. Most of the things look the same and we just ship more and more code.
Re: Highlights of the HTTP Archive Web Almanac 2021
#6> The "top scoring site" loaded over 60mb of CSS.
This is why my 100GB mobile data plan runs out in 3 days.
Re: Highlights of the HTTP Archive Web Almanac 2021
#7> Accessible video/audio is pretty much not existing.
He should have read more completely because the almanac notes:
> … this figure may not account for video content loaded by a third party , such as an embedded YouTube video. It should also be noted that most popular third-party audio and video embedding services include the ability to add synchronized text equivalents.
Re: Highlights of the HTTP Archive Web Almanac 2021
#8> Accessible video/audio is pretty much not existing. He should have read more completely because the almanac notes: > … this figure may not account for video content loaded by a third party , such as an embedded YouTube video. It should also be noted that most popular third-party audio and video embedding services include the ability to add synchronized text equivalents.
And that note is off mark as well. Most audio/video players load captions/subtitles out-of-band and do their own rendering or add them to the video element via JS for greater control.