Databricks response to Snowflake's accusation of lacking integrity
1–10 of 168 posts
Re: Databricks response to Snowflake's accusation of lacking integrity
#2Re: Databricks response to Snowflake's accusation of lacking integrity
#3Re: Databricks response to Snowflake's accusation of lacking integrity
#4Re: Databricks response to Snowflake's accusation of lacking integrity
#5Re: Databricks response to Snowflake's accusation of lacking integrity
#6The blog wars seem extremely ridiculous to me. I don't recall ever choosing one over another based on how fast it runs on some imaginary arbitrary dataset.
Re: Databricks response to Snowflake's accusation of lacking integrity
#7Everyone technical knew they would game every environment to come out with superior results. I suppose it worked. As the top executives buy big system software and ignore the IT crowd who could easily point out the flaws in the methodology of the"studies".
Breakdown of one of those example ads:
https://db2news.wordpress.com/2011/06/08/a-closer-examinatio...
Re: Databricks response to Snowflake's accusation of lacking integrity
#8Aside from the Azure/GCP/AWS internal offeringa I know about Snowflake and Firebolt, Databricks is new to me.
Re: Databricks response to Snowflake's accusation of lacking integrity
#9tl;dr: The data warehouse company used a pre-baked TPC-DS dataset and claimed they have similar performance to Databricks. Turns out if you use the official TPC-DS data generation scripts, you get much worse performance.