Using forums vs. Discord: why not both
channelsync.chat
Using forums vs. Discord: why not both
1–7 of 7 posts
Re: Using forums vs. Discord: why not both
#2Original thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29154216
Re: Using forums vs. Discord: why not both
#3I've seen a trending post on HN about the disavantages of using Discord vs a Forum. Coincidentally I've been working on a solution for that in the past weeks that allows you to create a mirrored version of your Discord server as an online forum. Original thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29154216
How about the other direction as well, forum-first discussions going into chat?
Re: Using forums vs. Discord: why not both
#4I worked at a startup that had 10 or 12 groupware tools when I started. Every two weeks or so the problem that people couldn’t find anything would come up in an all-hands and they’d suggest we add another tool and management would say yes and then we would have 11 or 13 groupware tools.
We don’t need another place to have discussions, we need ‘one ring to rule them all’ that brings them together, curated them, makes them findable.
That’s the direction where you are going. It is immensely valuable but it is also going against the flow.
Re: Using forums vs. Discord: why not both
#5I've seen a trending post on HN about the disavantages of using Discord vs a Forum. Coincidentally I've been working on a solution for that in the past weeks that allows you to create a mirrored version of your Discord server as an online forum. Original thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29154216
I certainly get having some kind of searchable log of a Discord server, but turning that into an actual forum with separate discussion threads and everything strikes me as something that probably doesn't work all that well. The forms of communication used in chats and in forums are pretty different. How have you handled this? How about the other direction as well, forum-first discussions going into chat?
Re: Using forums vs. Discord: why not both
#6I wouldn’t use that headline. I worked at a startup that had 10 or 12 groupware tools when I started. Every two weeks or so the problem that people couldn’t find anything would come up in an all-hands and they’d suggest we add another tool and management would say yes and then we would have 11 or 13 groupware tools. We don’t need another place to have discussions, we need ‘one ring to rule them all’ that brings them…
Usually these kind of communities probably need that their content should be indexable by Google or other search engines in order to be discovered by new users. So in my mind it shouldn't dilute the attention of the community members. Of course it's still a proof of concept and every feedback is super welcomed to understand better the environment
Re: Using forums vs. Discord: why not both
#7I wouldn’t use that headline. I worked at a startup that had 10 or 12 groupware tools when I started. Every two weeks or so the problem that people couldn’t find anything would come up in an all-hands and they’d suggest we add another tool and management would say yes and then we would have 11 or 13 groupware tools. We don’t need another place to have discussions, we need ‘one ring to rule them all’ that brings them…
I understand, I've been in the same situation before, not recommending it to anyone. Having more than 2 or 3 tools is like having no tool at all or worst. This idea was born more for Open Source communities or hobbyst, etc. rather than companies. So yeah I agree the headline here is a little bit misleading in that sense. Usually these kind of communities probably need that their content should be indexable by Google…