We analyzed 425k favicons
iconmap.io
We analyzed 425k favicons
1–10 of 131 posts
Re: We analyzed 425k favicons
#2The blog post is the analysis of the data set, the map is the visualization.
Re: We analyzed 425k favicons
#3Re: We analyzed 425k favicons
#4Aside: This article is a decent usecase for the esoteric `image-rendering: pixelated;` css property.
Re: We analyzed 425k favicons
#5Also see the gigantic map - https://iconmap.io The blog post is the analysis of the data set, the map is the visualization.
I don't see their data set though. hmmm.
maybe I'll just have to crawl it on my own if I want to do it.
Re: We analyzed 425k favicons
#6Also see the gigantic map - https://iconmap.io The blog post is the analysis of the data set, the map is the visualization.
Re: We analyzed 425k favicons
#7And I checked a few of the sites, I just got lorem-ipsum style landing pages. I wonder what's the point, or are the scammers using the domains mostly for emails?
Re: We analyzed 425k favicons
#8When adding a website/webapp to these earlier home screens, the OS would apply a gloss effect over the icon in order to match the aesthetic of the standard apps. The precomposed icon was a way for the developer to stop the OS from applying this effect, such as if their logo already had a different gloss effect already applied (i.e “precomposed”) or other design where adding the glossy shine wouldn’t look right. The standard icon allowed the OS to apply the gloss effect - which was a timesaver as Apple did tweak the gloss contour over the years: hence using a standard icon ensured that the website/webapp always matched the user’s OS version.
Re: We analyzed 425k favicons
#9Re: We analyzed 425k favicons
#10Sadly it doesn't quite work for me any more, but the youtube video does a decent job showing what it looked like when it worked.