Apple just fired a leader of the AppleToo movement
1–10 of 20 posts
Re: Apple just fired a leader of the AppleToo movement
#2Umm, what? Truly bizarre reason given. I would think Apple could give a more plausible reason to cover themselves for retaliation for organizing.
Re: Apple just fired a leader of the AppleToo movement
#3"Janneke Parrish was terminated for deleting files off her work phone, including the apps Robinhood, Pokémon GO, and Google Drive" Umm, what? Truly bizarre reason given. I would think Apple could give a more plausible reason to cover themselves for retaliation for organizing.
Re: Apple just fired a leader of the AppleToo movement
#4What baffles me is the Pokémon GO and Robinhood. What, they wanted to see her movement data as well as her share in Bitcoin? That's just dumb. And unless they needed her physical locations and movements at certain times and dates (for which they would need a specific order), they could have simply gone in the location data in the freaking settings!
Re: Apple just fired a leader of the AppleToo movement
#5"Janneke Parrish was terminated for deleting files off her work phone, including the apps Robinhood, Pokémon GO, and Google Drive" Umm, what? Truly bizarre reason given. I would think Apple could give a more plausible reason to cover themselves for retaliation for organizing.
With that, and “work phone” (presumably) implying the phone is Apple’s, she may have given Apple a reason to fire her, even if she deleted the app not to hide that she leaked info, but for other reasons.
But of course, that all depends on what exactly happened. Did she know Apple was investigating, did they tell her to hand in here phone for that investigation, etc.
Re: Apple just fired a leader of the AppleToo movement
#6I can kinda understand the Google Drive: they requested her files for an internal investigation (at least if I understood the article correctly), she deleted those files (by deleting the app through which they could have accessed the data) which is indeed a non-compliance, a bit like destroying evidence. What baffles me is the Pokémon GO and Robinhood. What, they wanted to see her movement data as well as her share i…
Apple probably didn’t care about Pokémon Go or Robinhood, and their inclusion in the reported list was probably an attempt to elicit exactly the type of misguided sympathetic reactions we’re now seeing here.
Re: Apple just fired a leader of the AppleToo movement
#7Re: Apple just fired a leader of the AppleToo movement
#8I've noticed tech employees conducting organizing activities using workplace resources, such as Slack. Even if I agree with the spirit of organizing activity, many people doing it seem totally out of their depth. Of course you are going to get nailed, unless the company is tolerating your organizing as PR or as a venting mechanism.
Re: Apple just fired a leader of the AppleToo movement
#9I can kinda understand the Google Drive: they requested her files for an internal investigation (at least if I understood the article correctly), she deleted those files (by deleting the app through which they could have accessed the data) which is indeed a non-compliance, a bit like destroying evidence. What baffles me is the Pokémon GO and Robinhood. What, they wanted to see her movement data as well as her share i…
Note that The Verge’s reporting is almost certainly sourced from the fired individual. Verge is not a reputable outlet. Apple probably didn’t care about Pokémon Go or Robinhood, and their inclusion in the reported list was probably an attempt to elicit exactly the type of misguided sympathetic reactions we’re now seeing here.
Re: Apple just fired a leader of the AppleToo movement
#10I've noticed tech employees conducting organizing activities using workplace resources, such as Slack. Even if I agree with the spirit of organizing activity, many people doing it seem totally out of their depth. Of course you are going to get nailed, unless the company is tolerating your organizing as PR or as a venting mechanism.
Last I checked, conducting organizing activities was something you cannot be fired for under employment law. What am I missing here?
(in this case the claimed reason is firing for deleting things from work devices while under investigation)