Live data from Hacker News

Interface ergonomics: automation isn't just about time saved

macoy.me

1–10 of 23 posts

Re: Interface ergonomics: automation isn't just about time saved

#2
As a UX practitioner with engineering experience, I'm happy to see an article like this, but also a bit disheartened that in 2021 it's still a revelation for many that frustration, satisfaction, and cognitive load are key considerations in prioritization in addition to raw efficiency.

Re: Interface ergonomics: automation isn't just about time saved

#3
As you make something cheaper demand for it goes up. Easy to forget about it when you try to calculate the value of automation. I'd say in most cases automation pays off if you do it properly, not to do the intended task but to do all the unintended tasks, reusing the automation code for later, reducing errors from manual work and opens up doors for new product design paths in the future.

This assumes that you actually own the product, if you don't own the product and just have a job to do then why bother about saving time, so in this case you should still automate it because automation is more fun.

Re: Interface ergonomics: automation isn't just about time saved

#4
post #2

As a UX practitioner with engineering experience, I'm happy to see an article like this, but also a bit disheartened that in 2021 it's still a revelation for many that frustration, satisfaction, and cognitive load are key considerations in prioritization in addition to raw efficiency.

How can you live? I took two classes in UX in college 20 years ago. I still can't walk into a kitchen without cursing the bad UX of the stove.

Re: Interface ergonomics: automation isn't just about time saved

#5
> Automation not only saves you time, it changes what you do.

This bears repeating. When you automate a task, you often push it over a "breakpoint" where it suddenly makes certain things profitable in terms of effort. For example, say you fill up a water bottle and place it within arm's reach, instead of running to the tap every time you're thirsty. You save maybe 10 seconds per sip, but the real win is that you can now consider behaviors like "drink water every 5 minutes" that previously you would have considered too much effort.

Re: Interface ergonomics: automation isn't just about time saved

#6
post #4
post #2

As a UX practitioner with engineering experience, I'm happy to see an article like this, but also a bit disheartened that in 2021 it's still a revelation for many that frustration, satisfaction, and cognitive load are key considerations in prioritization in addition to raw efficiency.

How can you live? I took two classes in UX in college 20 years ago. I still can't walk into a kitchen without cursing the bad UX of the stove.

Sounds similar to the consequences of reading Don Norman's «The Design of Everyday Things»...

Re: Interface ergonomics: automation isn't just about time saved

#7

> Automation not only saves you time, it changes what you do. This bears repeating. When you automate a task, you often push it over a "breakpoint" where it suddenly makes certain things profitable in terms of effort. For example, say you fill up a water bottle and place it within arm's reach, instead of running to the tap every time you're thirsty. You save maybe 10 seconds per sip, but the real win is that you can…

In the software development realm, the biggest spot I see automation paying off is when it fosters consistency.

To take an example from operations: To me (admittedly speaking from the developer side of things), the overwhelming benefit of containerization has nothing to do with elasticity or scaling or really any of the marketing buzzwords. The real benefit is that Docker and friends encourage presenting a much more consistent management surface to the operations team. In the short run, this is just the price of automation. In the long run, this greatly reduces the mental burden of understanding how all the individual pieces are configured and deployed.

Most of that was never anything but incidental complexity. I doubt that ops's job has actually become any easier over the past 20 years. But, even so, if they're spending less time just shaving yaks, that suggests that a greater proportion of what they're doing is genuinely valuable.

Re: Interface ergonomics: automation isn't just about time saved

#8
post #3

As you make something cheaper demand for it goes up. Easy to forget about it when you try to calculate the value of automation. I'd say in most cases automation pays off if you do it properly, not to do the intended task but to do all the unintended tasks, reusing the automation code for later, reducing errors from manual work and opens up doors for new product design paths in the future. This assumes that you actual…

Right, so we have a number of advantages of automation that aren't captured in a simplistic time calculation like the "Is It Worth the Time?" XKCD:

- if you can do something more quickly you might also choose to do it more often

- automation can reduce human errors

- once something is fully automated it can be used as a building block in a larger piece of automation

I can think of one more:

- automation can make it easier to hand over work to someone else, or increase the number of people who are able to do it

But also one disadvantage:

- automating something can lose a human "sanity check" (for example, you could generate reports full of missing data and maybe nobody will notice for a while)

Any more?

Re: Interface ergonomics: automation isn't just about time saved

#9
post #6
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How can you live? I took two classes in UX in college 20 years ago. I still can't walk into a kitchen without cursing the bad UX of the stove.

Sounds similar to the consequences of reading Don Norman's «The Design of Everyday Things»...

That book was part of my classes

Re: Interface ergonomics: automation isn't just about time saved

#10
> Cakelisp was a revelation because it was my chance to escape from these limitations. I had to pay my time in order to make something I consider better, but it was absolutely worth it. I was now in charge of the interface. I shaped the language, the language didn't shape me.

We are tool makers, making tools that we use in tool making so that the act of making tools for our tools is more enjoyable.

Post reply on HN