Delta does not appear to make children sicker
1–10 of 100 posts
Re: Delta does not appear to make children sicker
#2Double-whammy article, second title: Secondary immune response stronger after infection than after shot
Re: Delta does not appear to make children sicker
#3Double-whammy article, second title: Secondary immune response stronger after infection than after shot
Shhhh... don't let science get in the way of the ongoing power grab by the surveillance state and the ongoing money grab by big pharma
Re: Delta does not appear to make children sicker
#4Double-whammy article, second title: Secondary immune response stronger after infection than after shot
Shhhh... don't let science get in the way of the ongoing power grab by the surveillance state and the ongoing money grab by big pharma
What’s science supposed to be contradicting here? The article says Delta doesn’t make kids sicker than other variants, not that it doesn’t make them sick at all. A shot is still going to be preferable to an infection because it isn’t communicable.
Re: Delta does not appear to make children sicker
#5Double-whammy article, second title: Secondary immune response stronger after infection than after shot
The problem with infection to provide immunity is its variability, not its strength.
It's kind of moot anyways, infection + vaccine is better than just an infection.
Re: Delta does not appear to make children sicker
#6Double-whammy article, second title: Secondary immune response stronger after infection than after shot
If the immune response is comparable to that of a fully vaccinated person, we should be issuing "immunization cards" to people who have recovered.
The goal is to control the disease, not the people.
Re: Delta does not appear to make children sicker
#7Double-whammy article, second title: Secondary immune response stronger after infection than after shot
Even though all the science points to infection being better than vaccination at creating immune response, it's not accepted as an alternative. Ridiculous IMO.
Re: Delta does not appear to make children sicker
#8Double-whammy article, second title: Secondary immune response stronger after infection than after shot
The problem with infection to provide immunity is its variability, not its strength. It's kind of moot anyways, infection + vaccine is better than just an infection.
What do you mean the variability?
Re: Delta does not appear to make children sicker
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
Shhhh... don't let science get in the way of the ongoing power grab by the surveillance state and the ongoing money grab by big pharma
What’s science supposed to be contradicting here? The article says Delta doesn’t make kids sick er than other variants, not that it doesn’t make them sick at all. A shot is still going to be preferable to an infection because it isn’t communicable.
>What’s science supposed to be contradicting here?
There is significant contention over whether the vaccine provides better immunity than prior infection with many claiming it does. "Secondary immune response stronger after infection than after shot" is in direct contradiction of that claim. I haven't read the article in sufficient detail to comment on whether or not that title is justified.
Re: Delta does not appear to make children sicker
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
The problem with infection to provide immunity is its variability, not its strength. It's kind of moot anyways, infection + vaccine is better than just an infection.
What do you mean the variability?
Answer is in the post you reply to. Might want to reread.