Live data from Hacker News

Cloudflare R2 storage: Rapid and reliable object storage, minus the egress fees

blog.cloudflare.com

1–10 of 220 posts

Re: Cloudflare R2 storage: Rapid and reliable object storage, minus the egress fees

#3

Nice, and it seems to be quite cheap as well. It's unfortunate, tho, they don't talk about data residency: where are servers located? Where will my data be copied?

It's still in development, so no details about that yet. Maybe their top tier DCs?

"Our vision for R2 includes multi-region storage that automatically replicates objects to the locations they’re frequently requested from."

Re: Cloudflare R2 storage: Rapid and reliable object storage, minus the egress fees

#4

Nice, and it seems to be quite cheap as well. It's unfortunate, tho, they don't talk about data residency: where are servers located? Where will my data be copied?

What would you like the answer to be? Do you need regional control over data storage like we do with this https://blog.cloudflare.com/supporting-jurisdictional-restri...?

Re: Cloudflare R2 storage: Rapid and reliable object storage, minus the egress fees

#7
Really interesting, will R2 support lifecycle rules like S3 does? We write around 90 million files per month to S3, if we could replace that with R2 and have the files automatically expire after 30 days that'd be a pretty amazing price reduction for us.

Re: Cloudflare R2 storage: Rapid and reliable object storage, minus the egress fees

#9
post #5

Interesting pricing considering Backblaze is another Bandwidth Alliance member and they only charge $0.005/GBmonth (vs. $0.015/GBmonth). B2 + CloudFlare gives you a similar deal at a third the cost.

I'm excited because while B2 + Cloudflare is great, the speed+latency isn't the greatest for some applications. So there's definitely a place for R2 here to compete more with AWS S3 than B2.
Post reply on HN