F# enters Tiobe top 20 index for the first time
1–10 of 30 posts
Re: F# enters Tiobe top 20 index for the first time
#2I couldn't put it in the submission because of HN's dupe detection.
Re: F# enters Tiobe top 20 index for the first time
#3The confidence of the SuperCollider programming language has been set to 80%. The reason for this is quite funny. In order to prove that the TIOBE index can be manipulated easily, Adam Kennedy created an empty Perl library called Acme-SuperCollider-Programming. This was to boost the unknown programming language SuperCollider by adding it to Perl's popular library archive CPAN. Now 20% of all +"SuperCollider programming" come from this artificial library.
Yes, quite funny indeed, but not for the reasons they think. Just to show that Tiobe methodology is a joke. I don't understand how people take this seriously.
Re: F# enters Tiobe top 20 index for the first time
#4From the full article: The confidence of the SuperCollider programming language has been set to 80%. The reason for this is quite funny. In order to prove that the TIOBE index can be manipulated easily, Adam Kennedy created an empty Perl library called Acme-SuperCollider-Programming. This was to boost the unknown programming language SuperCollider by adding it to Perl's popular library archive CPAN. Now 20% of all +"…
Re: F# enters Tiobe top 20 index for the first time
#5From the full article: The confidence of the SuperCollider programming language has been set to 80%. The reason for this is quite funny. In order to prove that the TIOBE index can be manipulated easily, Adam Kennedy created an empty Perl library called Acme-SuperCollider-Programming. This was to boost the unknown programming language SuperCollider by adding it to Perl's popular library archive CPAN. Now 20% of all +"…
Who has a better methodology? Is there even a good one?
1) I use more metrics and
2) I don't go around making statements about how, from one month to the next, someone displaced someone else, or climbed into a certain ranking, or things like that.
3) I let people reweight the chart based on the metrics they like.
I think the numbers LangPop comes up with are pretty good, but by their very nature are a bit fuzzy.
Re: F# enters Tiobe top 20 index for the first time
#6Earlier quoted context omitted.
Who has a better methodology? Is there even a good one?
http://www.langpop.com is better because 1) I use more metrics and 2) I don't go around making statements about how, from one month to the next, someone displaced someone else, or climbed into a certain ranking, or things like that. 3) I let people reweight the chart based on the metrics they like. I think the numbers LangPop comes up with are pretty good, but by their very nature are a bit fuzzy.
Also, maybe add GitHub and StackOverflow as data sources?
Re: F# enters Tiobe top 20 index for the first time
#7 type LogicGate =
| ON
| OFF
| NAND of LogicGate * LogicGate
| NOT of LogicGate
| AND of LogicGate * LogicGate
| OR of LogicGate * LogicGate
| NOR of LogicGate * LogicGate
| XOR of LogicGate * LogicGate
| XNOR of LogicGate * LogicGate
let rec evaluate input =
match input with
| ON -> true
| OFF -> false
| NAND(a, b) -> not ((evaluate a) && (evaluate b))
| NOT(a) -> (evaluate (NAND(a, a)))
| AND(a, b) -> (evaluate (NOT(NAND(a, b))))
| OR(a, b) -> (evaluate (NAND(NOT(a), NOT(b))))
| NOR(a, b) -> (evaluate (NOT(OR(a, b))))
| XOR(a, b) -> (evaluate (AND(NAND(a, b), OR(a, b))))
| XNOR(a, b) -> (evaluate (NOT(XOR(a, b))))
[
NAND(OFF, OFF);
NAND(OFF, ON);
NAND(ON, OFF);
NAND(ON, ON)
] |> List.map (fun x -> printfn (evaluate x))Re: F# enters Tiobe top 20 index for the first time
#8Re: F# enters Tiobe top 20 index for the first time
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
http://www.langpop.com is better because 1) I use more metrics and 2) I don't go around making statements about how, from one month to the next, someone displaced someone else, or climbed into a certain ranking, or things like that. 3) I let people reweight the chart based on the metrics they like. I think the numbers LangPop comes up with are pretty good, but by their very nature are a bit fuzzy.
F# isn't listed on any of your charts. I think it's probably popular enough to show up in all of your data sources at this point. Also, maybe add GitHub and StackOverflow as data sources?
GitHub and StackOverflow started out really biased in terms of their communities - GitHub with Ruby, and StackOverflow with Microsoft languages. Do you think they've sufficiently lost that bias?