Developers Complain as App Store Feature Promotes Rip-Off Apps
forums.macrumors.com
Developers Complain as App Store Feature Promotes Rip-Off Apps
1–10 of 28 posts
Re: Developers Complain as App Store Feature Promotes Rip-Off Apps
#2Play Store also are plagued with this issue for years. There are reports and news about this for years and years. It is not surprisingly that App Store also plagued with this issue.
I recalled a news last year that a dev is SOL because someone in China registered the trademark of dev's work and use that trademark to force Google to suspend/ban the original dev without any recourse.
Fraudulent Trademark and patent trolls uses this method every chance they get and there is usually nothing that the original devs can do.
Re: Developers Complain as App Store Feature Promotes Rip-Off Apps
#3I posted the second tweet in the article which dives into one of the apps (note that nearly all the apps featured by Apple were subscription scams of a similar nature, one was non-functional, and the last one sold "coin packs" — probably the most benign of the bunch)
My main complaint is that the App Store allows developers to sell subscriptions which feature free trials that automatically convert into paid subscriptions
This system of automatically rolling-over a trial into a subscription provides zero benefit to the user. This only benefits developers who want to see extra revenue from people who forget to cancel their subscriptions prior to the trial ending
I have no idea why Apple does not prompt the user to purchase the subscription when they attempt to launch the app after the trial period. It would help a ton of people, it would prevent scam apps like this, it would drive trust in subscriptions as a business model for apps, it would help legitimate developers, and it would be good business for the App Store in the long term
There is no business sense to enabling the current trial mechanism, nor is there any benefit to users
Re: Developers Complain as App Store Feature Promotes Rip-Off Apps
#4There is a paradox with app stores in that they play the gatekeeper and can arbitrarily not allow certain apps, remove them, or enforce certain rules on what types of apps are allowed, but then also permit all sorts of shenanigans such as this.
The developers of these types of apps are just pushing the envelope of what's allowed until they're called out and formal complaints are made to the app store gatekeepers.
The malicious & overly expensive apps should get taken down swiftly, but are allowed to linger for months on end, generating large profits.
Whilst app stores are policed, there exists a lot of room for exploitative apps. I imagine these app store gatekeepers are trying to keep a balance, but app stores seem heavily swayed in favor of scams, and malicious or overly expensive apps.
Re: Developers Complain as App Store Feature Promotes Rip-Off Apps
#5This is yet another case of it being hard to take seriously Apple's curated store. Especially with the way the trial period works in Apple's system. It's a horrible system that operates on dark patterns.
Re: Developers Complain as App Store Feature Promotes Rip-Off Apps
#6I posted the second tweet in the article which dives into one of the apps (note that nearly all the apps featured by Apple were subscription scams of a similar nature, one was non-functional, and the last one sold "coin packs" — probably the most benign of the bunch) My main complaint is that the App Store allows developers to sell subscriptions which feature free trials that automatically convert into paid subscript…
> There is no business sense to enabling the current trial mechanism
Apple doesn't take their 30% cut on subscriptions?
Re: Developers Complain as App Store Feature Promotes Rip-Off Apps
#7I posted the second tweet in the article which dives into one of the apps (note that nearly all the apps featured by Apple were subscription scams of a similar nature, one was non-functional, and the last one sold "coin packs" — probably the most benign of the bunch) My main complaint is that the App Store allows developers to sell subscriptions which feature free trials that automatically convert into paid subscript…
> There is no business sense to enabling the current trial mechanism Apple doesn't take their 30% cut on subscriptions?
Why throw away the user trust they have earned in the App Store for the short-term profit of subscription scams?
There's no business sense there
The trust they have in their brand is worth far more. And they are allowing it to erode by featuring scam apps and by providing a subscription mechanism which is easy to abuse
Re: Developers Complain as App Store Feature Promotes Rip-Off Apps
#8Google Play Store has been littered with WHiteHatJr students who "somehow" built their own android apps & paid developer fees, yet publish dead google doc links as privacy policy & link back to the same top level domain of whitehatJr coding classes....such a travesty in the name of getting kids between 6-15 into coding by putting FOMO into their parents.
Re: Developers Complain as App Store Feature Promotes Rip-Off Apps
#9There is a paradox with app stores in that they play the gatekeeper and can arbitrarily not allow certain apps, remove them, or enforce certain rules on what types of apps are allowed, but then also permit all sorts of shenanigans such as this. The developers of these types of apps are just pushing the envelope of what's allowed until they're called out and formal complaints are made to the app store gatekeepers. The…
Like any unregulated capitalism they will do everything to maximise profit. They get profit regardless of whether the original or the copy is being purchased. They get profit if a user gets scammed through in-app purchases.
Re: Developers Complain as App Store Feature Promotes Rip-Off Apps
#10Here's a similar story from someone trying to find the Roomba app in the iOS App Store. The top search result is a sponsored ad for a scammy subscription app pretending to be the Roomba app. That Roomba's legitimate app is called simply "iRobot Home" and doesn't include the actual word "Roomba" or mention vacuums doesn't help!