Global Sourcebook for International Data Management
1–8 of 8 posts
Re: Global Sourcebook for International Data Management
#2Re: Global Sourcebook for International Data Management
#3A valuable resource, but needs to catch up with the gender diversity issues now coming to the fore.
Re: Global Sourcebook for International Data Management
#4A valuable resource, but needs to catch up with the gender diversity issues now coming to the fore.
Re: Global Sourcebook for International Data Management
#5Re: Global Sourcebook for International Data Management
#6A valuable resource, but needs to catch up with the gender diversity issues now coming to the fore.
Would you elaborate?
Re: Global Sourcebook for International Data Management
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
Would you elaborate?
I know of someone broadening the traditional "Mr/Mrs/Ms" "M/F" and is unclear on what to broaden it to, nor can find agreement amongst the clients as to what to broaden it to, beyond that they want it broadened.
Generally, I've seen Mr/M[r]s/Mx[0] and F/M/X.
The former is officially used in GB, but it sees informal use in US media and elsewhere. I live in a country that doesn't use honorifics, but I use 'Mx' where it's required. I'm unsure about non-English equivalents for 'Mx'.
The latter sees use in BE, DE, IS, MT, NL and on job boards in Europe and more progressive areas. It's also seeing use in the US on passports and NY birth certificates.
There are of course others, but none as widely adopted as these.
Re: Global Sourcebook for International Data Management
#8A valuable resource, but needs to catch up with the gender diversity issues now coming to the fore.