China Is Building a Second Nuclear Missile Silo Field
1–10 of 27 posts
Re: China Is Building a Second Nuclear Missile Silo Field
#2Silos are so far a apart that single warhead can destroy only one silo.
Arms control experts seem to think that China is building missile "sponge". Field of 120 silos would contain only 12 ICBM's or so. If they build enough silos into the desert and and decoys for the rest, the US must spend more and more missiles to destroy just few missiles.
The US had similar plan at the beginning of the Cold War. It became politically impossible to use eminent domain to create so large missile fields on farmland.
Re: China Is Building a Second Nuclear Missile Silo Field
#3Honestly I find this use of Google maps to find military sites or concentration camps questionable.
However it is fairly obvious to me that the Chinese are going to expand their nuclear weapons arsenal until it matches that of the Americans.
The solution for this is for the Americans to have a smaller arsenal.
Re: China Is Building a Second Nuclear Missile Silo Field
#4Silos are so far a apart that single warhead can destroy only one silo. Arms control experts seem to think that China is building missile "sponge". Field of 120 silos would contain only 12 ICBM's or so. If they build enough silos into the desert and and decoys for the rest, the US must spend more and more missiles to destroy just few missiles. The US had similar plan at the beginning of the Cold War. It became politi…
A simpler explanation is them simply expanding their offensive arsenal.
Why wouldn't they.
Re: China Is Building a Second Nuclear Missile Silo Field
#5A similar photo hit the web a month or so ago. Turned out to be windmills.
It makes no sense to put missile silos close together.
I’ll reserve judgment for now, but I doubt the headline’s claim.
Re: China Is Building a Second Nuclear Missile Silo Field
#6Honestly I find this use of Google maps to find military sites or concentration camps questionable. However it is fairly obvious to me that the Chinese are going to expand their nuclear weapons arsenal until it matches that of the Americans. The solution for this is for the Americans to have a smaller arsenal.
Why is it questionable? Because it might turn up dirty laundry?
The solution of reducing arms is moot. Pandora’s box has already been opened. Plus you don’t defend yourself by looking weak. I argue the nuclear arsenals around the world have kept everyone in line. WW1 was horrifying enough to deter any further war, then WW2 happened.
You can’t eradicate human conquest, but you can deter it with enough counterforce that makes the action seem too large of a sacrifice.
Re: China Is Building a Second Nuclear Missile Silo Field
#7Silos are so far a apart that single warhead can destroy only one silo. Arms control experts seem to think that China is building missile "sponge". Field of 120 silos would contain only 12 ICBM's or so. If they build enough silos into the desert and and decoys for the rest, the US must spend more and more missiles to destroy just few missiles. The US had similar plan at the beginning of the Cold War. It became politi…
A simpler explanation is them simply expanding their offensive arsenal. Why wouldn't they.
It's only simpler for you to think about. "Missile sponge" is simpler plan to execute and operate. ICBM's are expensive to build and maintain.
Chinese are expected to moderately expand their arsenal, but they don't need significantly more silo-based warheads for credible deterrence, they just need to increase survivability from decapitation attack. Missile sponge is very cost effective way to do that. Their road-mobile and rail-mobile DF-41 ICBM's provide already good deterrence, but putting the new DF-41s into silos just increases the variety and survivability of their ground based deterrence.
Re: China Is Building a Second Nuclear Missile Silo Field
#8Honestly I find this use of Google maps to find military sites or concentration camps questionable. However it is fairly obvious to me that the Chinese are going to expand their nuclear weapons arsenal until it matches that of the Americans. The solution for this is for the Americans to have a smaller arsenal.
Open source arms control experts don't just use Google maps.
Once they locate interesting spot, they can buy better quality satellite images and get better time coverage.
Re: China Is Building a Second Nuclear Missile Silo Field
#9Honestly I find this use of Google maps to find military sites or concentration camps questionable. However it is fairly obvious to me that the Chinese are going to expand their nuclear weapons arsenal until it matches that of the Americans. The solution for this is for the Americans to have a smaller arsenal.
>Honestly I find this use of Google maps to find military sites or concentration camps questionable.
True, completely uncensored high definition optical satellite pictures should be available and free to everyone.
BTW: Most of the pictures are from https://www.planet.com/
Re: China Is Building a Second Nuclear Missile Silo Field
#10Honestly I find this use of Google maps to find military sites or concentration camps questionable. However it is fairly obvious to me that the Chinese are going to expand their nuclear weapons arsenal until it matches that of the Americans. The solution for this is for the Americans to have a smaller arsenal.
Why is it questionable? Because it might turn up dirty laundry? The solution of reducing arms is moot. Pandora’s box has already been opened. Plus you don’t defend yourself by looking weak. I argue the nuclear arsenals around the world have kept everyone in line. WW1 was horrifying enough to deter any further war, then WW2 happened. You can’t eradicate human conquest, but you can deter it with enough counterforce tha…
A kid hired by some questionable think tank, sitting in an office a thousands miles away, analyzing a piece of land, he has never seen in real life, solely through a sattelite photo, driven by whatever politics and incentives ... well ... he just might be wrong.