How 38 Monks Took on the Funeral Cartel and Won
theatlantic.com
How 38 Monks Took on the Funeral Cartel and Won
1–10 of 29 posts
Re: How 38 Monks Took on the Funeral Cartel and Won
#2Re: How 38 Monks Took on the Funeral Cartel and Won
#3Re: How 38 Monks Took on the Funeral Cartel and Won
#4Re: How 38 Monks Took on the Funeral Cartel and Won
#5From the article: "'defendants moved to dismiss based on the legal issue of whether protecting a discrete interest group from economic competition constitutes a sufficient legitimate government purpose.' Put more simply, it's as if they said, Our purpose here is to protect profits in the funeral industry, these regulations are a rational way to do that, and we're allowed to pick market winners and losers if we so desire -- after all, its only intrastate commerce we're talking about."
Re: How 38 Monks Took on the Funeral Cartel and Won
#6It's amazing that it's even an issue.
That means they will fight with all means they can to insure that their ability to protect those margins is in place.
Re: How 38 Monks Took on the Funeral Cartel and Won
#7It's amazing that it's even an issue.
there are many businesses around today that you might only once in a lifetime come across - if even at all. Funeral homes, disaster restoration companies, etc. However, they are amazingly competitive industries and have amazingly high margins. That means they will fight with all means they can to insure that their ability to protect those margins is in place.
Re: How 38 Monks Took on the Funeral Cartel and Won
#8The basic story is that the funeral industry completely captured the regulating of the disposal of dead people a long, long time ago.
Re: How 38 Monks Took on the Funeral Cartel and Won
#9Re: How 38 Monks Took on the Funeral Cartel and Won
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
there are many businesses around today that you might only once in a lifetime come across - if even at all. Funeral homes, disaster restoration companies, etc. However, they are amazingly competitive industries and have amazingly high margins. That means they will fight with all means they can to insure that their ability to protect those margins is in place.
How can they be amazingly competitive industries AND have amazingly high margins at the same time? I thought those were mutually exclusive things.
First, in my examples above, those businesses are highly undesirable industries to be involved in as an owner and an employee, but highly profitable. Second, most of those above listed businesses are family owned with a lot of experience and background in the industry they represent.
Newcomers are viewed as strongly suspicious and since those existing entities know the ins and outs, it is an uphill climb.
This doesn't mean that good innovation cannot overcome the obstacles that these very established businesses have, but you can bet that tradition and experience in those businesses will lead to a lot of ammunition for a fierce fight when newcomers arrive on the scene.