Nobody should trust Wikipedia, says man who invented Wikipedia
independent.co.uk
Nobody should trust Wikipedia, says man who invented Wikipedia
1–5 of 5 posts
Re: Nobody should trust Wikipedia, says man who invented Wikipedia
#2> "You can't cite the Daily Mail or Fox News on socio-political issues."
> On today's #LDTV, Wikipedia co-founder @lsanger claims that the website's Left-wing bias is so strong that publications like the Daily Mail and Fox are "banned".
Don't miss https://unherd.com/thepost/wikipe
Is it purely monetary in that if they'd included any of those details in the headline then no one would have clicked? The right-leaning papers and source of the video all thought that was the main point of his argument, but this newspaper leaves it all quite vague.
Re: Nobody should trust Wikipedia, says man who invented Wikipedia
#3Re: Nobody should trust Wikipedia, says man who invented Wikipedia
#4I'm intrigued by the process that results in this being reported by a nominally left-leaning paper, but leaving out all the details that make it clear that it's left wing bias at work. > "You can't cite the Daily Mail or Fox News on socio-political issues." > On today's #LDTV, Wikipedia co-founder @lsanger claims that the website's Left-wing bias is so strong that publications like the Daily Mail and Fox are "banned"…
What? The article's sole example is about the lack of Republican viewpoint on the Joe Biden article.
Re: Nobody should trust Wikipedia, says man who invented Wikipedia
#5I'm intrigued by the process that results in this being reported by a nominally left-leaning paper, but leaving out all the details that make it clear that it's left wing bias at work. > "You can't cite the Daily Mail or Fox News on socio-political issues." > On today's #LDTV, Wikipedia co-founder @lsanger claims that the website's Left-wing bias is so strong that publications like the Daily Mail and Fox are "banned"…
> ...but leaving out all the details that make it clear that it's left wing bias at work. What? The article's sole example is about the lack of Republican viewpoint on the Joe Biden article.