Live data from Hacker News

Word gap: When money’s tight, parents talk less to kids

news.berkeley.edu

1–10 of 172 posts

Re: Word gap: When money’s tight, parents talk less to kids

#3
In the first experiment, researchers sought to observe how parents would interact with their children (in this case, 3-year-olds) after the parents were asked to describe times in which they had recently experienced scarcity. A control group of parents were instead asked to describe other recent activities.

How many studies like this need to not replicate before we stop treating them seriously?

Re: Word gap: When money’s tight, parents talk less to kids

#4
A somewhat suspicious aspect of these claims is that not all of the studies actually attempt to isolate poverty as a causal factor of tersity, rather than tersity and poverty sharing a causal factor (which a priori seems much more likely to me). One of the studies does use time-of-month vs tersity, to attempt to control for such shared factors, but time-of-month seems like a questionably accurate (if clever) proxy variable here.

Re: Word gap: When money’s tight, parents talk less to kids

#5

A cynical explanation is that they talk less because on some level they know that talking tends to reveal needs that require money to meet.

Is that cynical? It seems like a reasonable guess. It was my first thought before even heading to the article or comments

Re: Word gap: When money’s tight, parents talk less to kids

#6
But consider also:

> It is a well-documented fact that by the age of 5 monolingual White children will have heard 30 million fewer words in languages other than English than bilingual children of color. In addition, they will have had a complete lack of exposure to the richness of non-standardized varieties of English that characterize the homes of many children of color. This language gap increases the longer these children are in school. The question is what causes this language gap and what can be done to address it?

> The major cause of this language gap is the failure of monolingual White communities to successfully assimilate into the multilingual and multidialectal mainstream. The continued existence of White ethnic enclaves persists despite concerted efforts to integrate White communities into the multiracial mainstream since the 1960s. In these linguistically isolated enclaves it is possible to go for days without interacting with anybody who does not speak Standardized American English providing little incentive for their inhabitants to adapt to the multilingual and multidialectal nature of US society.

> This linguistic isolation has a detrimental effect on the cognitive development of monolingual White children. This is because linguistically isolated households lack the rich translanguaging practices that are found in bilingual households and the elaborate style-shifting that occurs in bidialectal households. This leaves monolingual White children without a strong metalinguistic basis for language learning. As a result, many of these monolingual White children lack the school-readiness skills needed for foreign language learning and graduate from school having mastered nothing but Standardized American English leaving them ill-equipped to engage in intercultural communication.

https://educationallinguist.wordpress.com/2015/07/06/what-if...

Re: Word gap: When money’s tight, parents talk less to kids

#7

But consider also: > It is a well-documented fact that by the age of 5 monolingual White children will have heard 30 million fewer words in languages other than English than bilingual children of color. In addition, they will have had a complete lack of exposure to the richness of non-standardized varieties of English that characterize the homes of many children of color. This language gap increases the longer these…

"speak vernacular, or else"

Re: Word gap: When money’s tight, parents talk less to kids

#8
post #5

A cynical explanation is that they talk less because on some level they know that talking tends to reveal needs that require money to meet.

Is that cynical? It seems like a reasonable guess. It was my first thought before even heading to the article or comments

Good point. Even if I sincerely care only about my children, if most of their prospective needs require money to meet, the most effective response to a lack of money is to devote more time to getting money and less time to listening.

Re: Word gap: When money’s tight, parents talk less to kids

#9
post #3

In the first experiment, researchers sought to observe how parents would interact with their children (in this case, 3-year-olds) after the parents were asked to describe times in which they had recently experienced scarcity. A control group of parents were instead asked to describe other recent activities. How many studies like this need to not replicate before we stop treating them seriously?

It fits my world view so it must be true.

Jokin aside I've seen way better studies of this kind where the parents would wear a mic at home and they would then do a word count, word analysis, etc.

Re: Word gap: When money’s tight, parents talk less to kids

#10

But consider also: > It is a well-documented fact that by the age of 5 monolingual White children will have heard 30 million fewer words in languages other than English than bilingual children of color. In addition, they will have had a complete lack of exposure to the richness of non-standardized varieties of English that characterize the homes of many children of color. This language gap increases the longer these…

nvm
Post reply on HN