Google employees angered by search giant's 'hypocritical' remote work policies
1–9 of 9 posts
Re: Google employees angered by search giant's 'hypocritical' remote work policies
#2The Xooglers are in for a rude awakening, I fear. This is literally the norm in every other company.
Re: Google employees angered by search giant's 'hypocritical' remote work policies
#3Re: Google employees angered by search giant's 'hypocritical' remote work policies
#4However the following should be very much disallowed:
> The move, however, came with a 15% salary cut, she said. Then in late March, the team was told it would be a 25% cut.
Forcing a pay cut due to a business decision is rather wrong. I don't know US employment laws but that surely would have to be illegal.
Re: Google employees angered by search giant's 'hypocritical' remote work policies
#5It seems like he made a very wise choice.
Re: Google employees angered by search giant's 'hypocritical' remote work policies
#6Re: Google employees angered by search giant's 'hypocritical' remote work policies
#7The different treatment of an executive is kind of expect to those of the rank and file. However the following should be very much disallowed: > The move, however, came with a 15% salary cut, she said. Then in late March, the team was told it would be a 25% cut. Forcing a pay cut due to a business decision is rather wrong. I don't know US employment laws but that surely would have to be illegal.
Re: Google employees angered by search giant's 'hypocritical' remote work policies
#8The different treatment of an executive is kind of expect to those of the rank and file. However the following should be very much disallowed: > The move, however, came with a 15% salary cut, she said. Then in late March, the team was told it would be a 25% cut. Forcing a pay cut due to a business decision is rather wrong. I don't know US employment laws but that surely would have to be illegal.
What employment laws? Employers can lower your slary or fire you at any time here. The governing principle is "at will."
Thanks, I understand now. Those types of conditions seem pretty bad.