Show HN: AutoDev Analytics Dev Measurement and Benchmark
autodevtech.com
Show HN: AutoDev Analytics Dev Measurement and Benchmark
1–4 of 4 posts
Re: Show HN: AutoDev Analytics Dev Measurement and Benchmark
#2We’ve got stats showing most code doesn’t get any feedback in code review[1], unreviewed code is twice as likely to churn out over a year than reviewed code[2], and teams spend about 3 hours per week reviewing code[3]. And we’ve got benchmarks for dozens of other metrics like code review turnaround and monthly codebase churn.
Take a look, sign up for analytics and let us know what you think.
[1] http://www.autodevtech.com/benchmark/scorecard/denoland/deno... [2] http://www.autodevtech.com/benchmark/scorecard/nodejs/node/c... [3] http://www.autodevtech.com/benchmark/scorecard/puppeteer/pup...
Re: Show HN: AutoDev Analytics Dev Measurement and Benchmark
#3Re: Show HN: AutoDev Analytics Dev Measurement and Benchmark
#4This is fantastic; this was always a hunch I had but you've put metrics behind the cost of unreviewed code. We just signed up two more of our repos for analysis.
We believe there's a lot of information locked in dev tools like code review that can shed quantitative light on how those processes lead to successes or failures in development. This is in partnership with the kind of anecdototes and best practices experienced devs and managers already frequently share.