Positive Energy Warp Drive from Hidden Geometric Structures
1–10 of 194 posts
Re: Positive Energy Warp Drive from Hidden Geometric Structures
#2> A modest numerical analysis is carried out on a set of example configurations, finding total energy requirements four orders of magnitude smaller than the solar mass.
Can someone smarter than me say whether this is within the (reasonable-ish?) realm of matter-antimatter reactions? Like Star Trek!? 4 orders of magnitude less than the sun's mass does sound like a positive development - still a lot but less than before, right?
Re: Positive Energy Warp Drive from Hidden Geometric Structures
#3I mean with lines like "A geometrical interpretation of the Eulerian energy is found, shedding new light on superluminal solitons generated by realistic energy distributions" I'm still not sure it wasn't...
Re: Positive Energy Warp Drive from Hidden Geometric Structures
#4This sounds pretty amazing, but I also have no real idea what I'm reading. > A modest numerical analysis is carried out on a set of example configurations, finding total energy requirements four orders of magnitude smaller than the solar mass. Can someone smarter than me say whether this is within the (reasonable-ish?) realm of matter-antimatter reactions? Like Star Trek!? 4 orders of magnitude less than the sun's ma…
Re: Positive Energy Warp Drive from Hidden Geometric Structures
#5This sounds pretty amazing, but I also have no real idea what I'm reading. > A modest numerical analysis is carried out on a set of example configurations, finding total energy requirements four orders of magnitude smaller than the solar mass. Can someone smarter than me say whether this is within the (reasonable-ish?) realm of matter-antimatter reactions? Like Star Trek!? 4 orders of magnitude less than the sun's ma…
If this paper is correct, it brings the requirements down to a tenth of Jupiter's mass, which is probably somewhat achievable for a type I civilization. The Enterprise would be the size of a small gas giant to hold an equivalent amount of matter and antimatter. It'd be able to enter warp once.
Re: Positive Energy Warp Drive from Hidden Geometric Structures
#6Re: Positive Energy Warp Drive from Hidden Geometric Structures
#7This sounds pretty amazing, but I also have no real idea what I'm reading. > A modest numerical analysis is carried out on a set of example configurations, finding total energy requirements four orders of magnitude smaller than the solar mass. Can someone smarter than me say whether this is within the (reasonable-ish?) realm of matter-antimatter reactions? Like Star Trek!? 4 orders of magnitude less than the sun's ma…
That’s something like 10^43 joules. Still not achievable anytime soon.
Re: Positive Energy Warp Drive from Hidden Geometric Structures
#80: Soliton - A "single bump" wave that propagates. See youtube for examples in water. These are (well-studied) solutions to the wave equation. In spacetime, we want some local "warp bubble" bump that is capable of moving/propagating around.
1: Negative energy density: Colloquially, this is like requiring negative mass. Nobody knows if this exists; most aren't hopeful.
2: Nice pun.
3: Positive semi-definite energy: I.e. non-negative (>=0)
4: So we're still talking mass-energies of Jupiter-(ish)-sized planets
This is very cool stuff. Definitely going to read the whole paper after work. Current questions:
- Is this really superluminal? Famously, the Alcubierre "warp bubble" solution doesn't actually propagate you superluminally unless you start it off that way.
- Is there a Minkowskian interior? The warped part of space is like your engine. We also need to have it carry around some flat space if we want it to be capable of carrying passengers.
- Can we construe this into PoC tests? How much energy do we need to detect warping (e.g. laser deflection) with current tech? Could some large-scale LIGO-like setup achieve detection?
Re: Positive Energy Warp Drive from Hidden Geometric Structures
#9Re: Positive Energy Warp Drive from Hidden Geometric Structures
#10This sounds pretty amazing, but I also have no real idea what I'm reading. > A modest numerical analysis is carried out on a set of example configurations, finding total energy requirements four orders of magnitude smaller than the solar mass. Can someone smarter than me say whether this is within the (reasonable-ish?) realm of matter-antimatter reactions? Like Star Trek!? 4 orders of magnitude less than the sun's ma…
> 4 orders of magnitude less than the sun's mass does sound like a positive development - still a lot but less than before, right? That’s something like 10^43 joules. Still not achievable anytime soon.
After all, if it was easy then everyone would be doing it.