Incremental note-taking
thesephist.com
Incremental note-taking
1–10 of 68 posts
Re: Incremental note-taking
#2The author dances around the two main properties that all good note-taking methods have:
1. It's easy to add new notes 2. It's easy to look through old notes to find what you want
Pencil and paper, or bound journals, do the former very easily. The latter is much harder, unless you start some indexing system (such as a bullet journal solution). This suggests searching and tagging are ideal, which digital is good for. But, and I cannot stress this enough, (1) is more important than (2). It is not impossible to find information in hand-written notes, just harder. But the exact moment it becomes hard to take new notes, the solution fails because you won't use it. And I believe Workflowy does all of this, with quick nesting, easy extension, and even quick reorganization. And you can quickly drop into "just let me write some notes," then go back and organize later (even splitting your notes up into subcomponents, if you want).
Re: Incremental note-taking
#3Re: Incremental note-taking
#4No discussion of Workflowy ( https://workflowy.com/ )? It is, in my opinion, by far the best note-taking app I have used. You can search, reorganize, and freely move content as you take it, and also after. You can nest a whole campaign of D&D notes next to your favorite recipes, and it feels natural due to their focus level model. More importantly, it's absolutely dead simple, and it "gets out of the way." The author…
Re: Incremental note-taking
#5It seems there's been a mini-renaissance surrounding some of these topics.
Re: Incremental note-taking
#6Re: Incremental note-taking
#7I don't quite understand what's the problem here. You capture ideas digitally, and later, you can revisit them just the same as you revisit paper notebooks.
Re: Incremental note-taking
#8>The tragedy of Apple Notes is that it’s an idea black hole. I don't quite understand what's the problem here. You capture ideas digitally, and later, you can revisit them just the same as you revisit paper notebooks.
Re: Incremental note-taking
#9>The tragedy of Apple Notes is that it’s an idea black hole. I don't quite understand what's the problem here. You capture ideas digitally, and later, you can revisit them just the same as you revisit paper notebooks.
Agreed. I didn't understand this part. I exclusively use Apple Notes for typed and handwritten notes. I also find the search functionality to be excellent at finding stuff I need, so I'm not sure why the author bashes Apple Notes search either.
Re: Incremental note-taking
#10> Captured ideas are better than missed ones.
> Ideas that can’t be recalled are worse than useless – effective search and recall form the soul of great notes.
In thinktype, you write and search notes at the same time. You can start both writing and searching (which are the same) right when you open the app.
> Time is essential to how we remember, and should be a first-class concept in a good note-taking system.
In thinktype, you see a relative time for every note ("two weeks").
When you open the app you see all notes sorted by recency. You can also easily sort search results by recency, for example to see how your thinking on a topic developed.