Visual.ly's infographics are not designed for the Internet: For Web, Not Walls
1–5 of 5 posts
Re: Visual.ly's infographics are not designed for the Internet: For Web, Not Walls
#2While I don't doubt there's some call for that, I can't see that being desirable in most use cases.
Re: Visual.ly's infographics are not designed for the Internet: For Web, Not Walls
#3Re: Visual.ly's infographics are not designed for the Internet: For Web, Not Walls
#4When I look at an infographic, I don't want pieces of it hidden. I want it to tell me the story. I don't want it to be headlines of a story, and have to interact to get the whole thing. While I don't doubt there's some call for that, I can't see that being desirable in most use cases.
A bunch of CSS3 animations whizzing around the page is the last thing we need. (Though it's likely to happen as people go crazy with new capabilities).
But with a bit of constraint these can be used to add value, simply the difference between good and bad design.
Simple HTML markup with a bit of CSS position would be a huge step up from flat jpegs, particularly as far as type is concerned.
Re: Visual.ly's infographics are not designed for the Internet: For Web, Not Walls
#5If you are ever looking for inspiration or best practices, these papers are the place to go, not CoolInfographics.com or wherever else.