Changes to Docker Hub Autobuilds

#1

Post by bnr » Tue, Jun 08, 2021, 12:06 PM UTC

Changes to Docker Hub Autobuilds
docker.com

Re: Changes to Docker Hub Autobuilds

#2

Post by yabones » Tue, Jun 08, 2021, 12:18 PM UTC

I think Docker (the company) just admitted defeat to GitHub. Wow. It's amazing how they blew such an incredible lead over the last decade.

Re: Changes to Docker Hub Autobuilds

#3

Post by kryptn » Tue, Jun 08, 2021, 12:43 PM UTC

yabones wrote: post #2

I think Docker (the company) just admitted defeat to GitHub. Wow. It's amazing how they blew such an incredible lead over the last decade.

I wouldn't assume this has anything to do with GitHub, It's just another free CI service that was being abused by crypto miners.

Re: Changes to Docker Hub Autobuilds

#4

Post by nirui » Tue, Jun 08, 2021, 12:43 PM UTC

Sad. I was hoping for multi-arch support (for Free tier, I don't make money out of my opensource image), and got this instead.

I wish the company could eventually found a way to make more money. Kubernetes too heavy to run, while Docker Swarm is rather reasonable. I guess there is a market gap?(???)

Re: Changes to Docker Hub Autobuilds

#5

Post by detaro » Tue, Jun 08, 2021, 12:43 PM UTC

nirui wrote: post #4

Sad. I was hoping for multi-arch support (for Free tier, I don't make money out of my opensource image), and got this instead. I wish the company could eventually found a way to make more money. Kubernetes too heavy to run, while Docker Swarm is rather reasonable. I guess there is a market gap?(???)

It's hard to make more money if all people expect is more free service.

Re: Changes to Docker Hub Autobuilds

#6

Post by howolduis » Tue, Jun 08, 2021, 12:48 PM UTC

cryptocurrencies are ruining hardware availability (both GPU and now storage devices), the environment and now free cloud services. When are we gonna admit it?

EDIT: typo

Re: Changes to Docker Hub Autobuilds

#7

Post by brennerm » Tue, Jun 08, 2021, 12:52 PM UTC

howolduis wrote: post #6

cryptocurrencies are ruining hardware availability (both GPU and now storage devices), the environment and now free cloud services. When are we gonna admit it? EDIT: typo

Guess you mean "ruining"?

Re: Changes to Docker Hub Autobuilds

#8

Post by damsta » Tue, Jun 08, 2021, 12:53 PM UTC

yabones wrote: post #2

I think Docker (the company) just admitted defeat to GitHub. Wow. It's amazing how they blew such an incredible lead over the last decade.

Just wait another week or two and we are going to see a similar story about GitHub Actions.

Re: Changes to Docker Hub Autobuilds

#9

Post by simcop2387 » Tue, Jun 08, 2021, 1:01 PM UTC

damsta wrote: post #8

yabones wrote: post #2

I think Docker (the company) just admitted defeat to GitHub. Wow. It's amazing how they blew such an incredible lead over the last decade.

Just wait another week or two and we are going to see a similar story about GitHub Actions.

They did similar a few months ago, https://www.infoq.com/news/2021/04/GitHub-actions-cryptomini...

Re: Changes to Docker Hub Autobuilds

#10

Post by mulltea » Tue, Jun 08, 2021, 1:04 PM UTC

nirui wrote: post #4

Sad. I was hoping for multi-arch support (for Free tier, I don't make money out of my opensource image), and got this instead. I wish the company could eventually found a way to make more money. Kubernetes too heavy to run, while Docker Swarm is rather reasonable. I guess there is a market gap?(???)

GitHub's Container Registry has multi-platform support, and I haven't encountered any limits. I believe the same is true of Google's Container Registry. There's not much reason to sacrifice features to use Docker's own registry.