1700 Cascadia Earthquake
en.wikipedia.org
1700 Cascadia Earthquake
1–10 of 118 posts
Re: 1700 Cascadia Earthquake
#2Re: 1700 Cascadia Earthquake
#3Re: 1700 Cascadia Earthquake
#4Would not be complete without this fantastic article: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/07/20/the-really-big...
That's the next earthquake.
Re: 1700 Cascadia Earthquake
#5Ouch.
Re: 1700 Cascadia Earthquake
#6"Our operating assumption is that everything west of Interstate 5 will be toast." Ouch.
Most of the infill west of I5 in the Seattle area will probably liquefy, but there's mountain ranges to the west of I5 that would take a hell of a quake to toast.
Re: 1700 Cascadia Earthquake
#7Would not be complete without this fantastic article: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/07/20/the-really-big...
And Peter Watts' Starfish, from the web site of the author https://www.rifters.com/real/STARFISH.htm That's the next earthquake.
https://pnsn.org/blog/2020/01/27/getting-ready-for-the-next-...
Re: 1700 Cascadia Earthquake
#8"Our operating assumption is that everything west of Interstate 5 will be toast." Ouch.
It's a great soundbite, but it loses a lot of context when distilled down. Most of the infill west of I5 in the Seattle area will probably liquefy, but there's mountain ranges to the west of I5 that would take a hell of a quake to toast.
Re: 1700 Cascadia Earthquake
#9"Our operating assumption is that everything west of Interstate 5 will be toast." Ouch.
It's a great soundbite, but it loses a lot of context when distilled down. Most of the infill west of I5 in the Seattle area will probably liquefy, but there's mountain ranges to the west of I5 that would take a hell of a quake to toast.
Specifically, the perpetual habitability for humans