Ask HN: Why is Microsoft never included in FAANG?
1–6 of 6 posts
Re: Ask HN: Why is Microsoft never included in FAANG?
#2The original acronym was a Jim Cramer-ism for "high-flying tech stocks" and started before Microsoft was really starting its comeback. It didn't have any direct relation to market cap or dominance, just how quickly the stocks were rising and how much positive investor sentiment there was around the stocks.
Re: Ask HN: Why is Microsoft never included in FAANG?
#3The term was coined by Jim Cramer, the television host of CNBC's Mad Money, in 2013...
He's an entertainer, not an expert at developing exhaustively correct acronyms, updating them, and defending them to the satisfaction of nerds everywhere. Though, in his defence, he was a hedge fund manager. Still though not an academic at this point in his career.
Re: Ask HN: Why is Microsoft never included in FAANG?
#4Because then it would be FAANMG or FAANGM which doesn't sound as cool. The original acronym was a Jim Cramer-ism for "high-flying tech stocks" and started before Microsoft was really starting its comeback. It didn't have any direct relation to market cap or dominance, just how quickly the stocks were rising and how much positive investor sentiment there was around the stocks.
They've certainly reemerged strongly and good for them, but FAANG (or whatever the fuck) seems to be leading consumer brands.
Re: Ask HN: Why is Microsoft never included in FAANG?
#5Re: Ask HN: Why is Microsoft never included in FAANG?
#6Because then it would be FAANMG or FAANGM which doesn't sound as cool. The original acronym was a Jim Cramer-ism for "high-flying tech stocks" and started before Microsoft was really starting its comeback. It didn't have any direct relation to market cap or dominance, just how quickly the stocks were rising and how much positive investor sentiment there was around the stocks.