Shipping containers are falling overboard at a rapid rate
supplychainbrain.com
Shipping containers are falling overboard at a rapid rate
1–10 of 159 posts
Re: Shipping containers are falling overboard at a rapid rate
#2Re: Shipping containers are falling overboard at a rapid rate
#3Re: Shipping containers are falling overboard at a rapid rate
#4Under rated statement of the day .. “These vessels are designed to carry the boxes, and to have these losses is — dare I say it — unacceptable.”
Re: Shipping containers are falling overboard at a rapid rate
#5Re: Shipping containers are falling overboard at a rapid rate
#6No mention of recovery. I wonder.. are the containers ever recovered, or is it prohibitively expensive, or, logistically near impossible?
Re: Shipping containers are falling overboard at a rapid rate
#7Re: Shipping containers are falling overboard at a rapid rate
#8No mention of recovery. I wonder.. are the containers ever recovered, or is it prohibitively expensive, or, logistically near impossible?
They have a valve that scuttles them after a few hours otherwise they are a big hazard for other boats
"Depending on whether they are full or empty, and on the nature of the cargo inside, containers may float at the surface for several days or weeks prior to sinking. Containers are not generally entirely watertight; while an empty container is likely to sink due to water ingress, a full container will likely float until air trapped in the cargo has escaped.’"
Re: Shipping containers are falling overboard at a rapid rate
#9This has been going on for decades but nobody cares because there are no consequences
Re: Shipping containers are falling overboard at a rapid rate
#10One anecdote I remember from Levinson's book is about a scottish whisky distiller exporting to the US being very excited about being able to ship whisky in a giant stainless steel vessel inside a container instead of shipping individual bottles inside wooden crates (imagine the theft during loading/unloading...).
That said, shipping containers were not adopted because they reduced theft and damage (consequently the cost of insuring cargo), they were adopted because they offered much lower costs to shippers (after enough investment in ships and ports and cranes and trucks and changes to transport regulation to provide the infrastructure to move containers around efficiently without double-handling them or unloading and repacking them for technical/labour/regulatory reasons).
Marc Levinson's book _The Box_ about the history of the shipping container is worth a read -- https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691170817/th...