Live data from Hacker News

Shipping containers are falling overboard at a rapid rate

supplychainbrain.com

1–10 of 159 posts

Re: Shipping containers are falling overboard at a rapid rate

#6

No mention of recovery. I wonder.. are the containers ever recovered, or is it prohibitively expensive, or, logistically near impossible?

They have a valve that scuttles them after a few hours otherwise they are a big hazard for other boats

Re: Shipping containers are falling overboard at a rapid rate

#8
post #6

No mention of recovery. I wonder.. are the containers ever recovered, or is it prohibitively expensive, or, logistically near impossible?

They have a valve that scuttles them after a few hours otherwise they are a big hazard for other boats

Perhaps some new ones do, but generally most containers have nothing of the sort:

"Depending on whether they are full or empty, and on the nature of the cargo inside, containers may float at the surface for several days or weeks prior to sinking. Containers are not generally entirely watertight; while an empty container is likely to sink due to water ingress, a full container will likely float until air trapped in the cargo has escaped.’"

Re: Shipping containers are falling overboard at a rapid rate

#9

This has been going on for decades but nobody cares because there are no consequences

There are quite obviously consequences, but perhaps not for the people who are in a position to ensure the containers don't fall overboard? Somebody is certainly losing money here.

Re: Shipping containers are falling overboard at a rapid rate

#10
To anchor discussion, prior to the rise of intermodal shipping containers in the '60s & '70s, cargo was shipped as breakbulk cargo. Losses from theft and damage were considerably reduced by switching from breakbulk cargo to shipping containers. Not the same as losing stuff over the side, but still a regular and somewhat predictable expense.

One anecdote I remember from Levinson's book is about a scottish whisky distiller exporting to the US being very excited about being able to ship whisky in a giant stainless steel vessel inside a container instead of shipping individual bottles inside wooden crates (imagine the theft during loading/unloading...).

That said, shipping containers were not adopted because they reduced theft and damage (consequently the cost of insuring cargo), they were adopted because they offered much lower costs to shippers (after enough investment in ships and ports and cranes and trucks and changes to transport regulation to provide the infrastructure to move containers around efficiently without double-handling them or unloading and repacking them for technical/labour/regulatory reasons).

Marc Levinson's book _The Box_ about the history of the shipping container is worth a read -- https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691170817/th...

Post reply on HN