Superintelligence Risk Project: Conclusion

#1

Post by soarfourmore » Wed, Apr 28, 2021, 7:32 PM UTC

Superintelligence Risk Project: Conclusion
jefftk.com

Re: Superintelligence Risk Project: Conclusion

#2

Post by financialize » Wed, Apr 28, 2021, 7:46 PM UTC

Superintelligence is overhyped. If you want to understand why then follow Mellanie Mitchell on Twitter: https://mobile.twitter.com/MelMitchell1/

Re: Superintelligence Risk Project: Conclusion

#3

Post by RuffleGordon » Wed, Apr 28, 2021, 9:04 PM UTC

financialize wrote: post #2

Superintelligence is overhyped. If you want to understand why then follow Mellanie Mitchell on Twitter: https://mobile.twitter.com/MelMitchell1/

There was also a good discussion on HN [0] about a new paper by Melanie Mitchell "Why AI is Harder Than We Think" [1]

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26964819

[1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.12871

Re: Superintelligence Risk Project: Conclusion

#4

Post by financialize » Fri, Apr 30, 2021, 2:32 AM UTC

RuffleGordon wrote: post #3

financialize wrote: post #2

Superintelligence is overhyped. If you want to understand why then follow Mellanie Mitchell on Twitter: https://mobile.twitter.com/MelMitchell1/

There was also a good discussion on HN [0] about a new paper by Melanie Mitchell "Why AI is Harder Than We Think" [1] [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26964819 [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.12871

Thanks but I avoid HN discussions. I find them to be smartypants signaling with very little substance and the opaque moderation doesn't help matters since dang and anyone else can change some numbers with their root access and silence any worthwhile discussion.