DRPC, a Replacement for gRPC

#1

Post by jostein » Wed, Apr 28, 2021, 11:38 AM UTC

Re: DRPC, a Replacement for gRPC

#2

Post by taklimakan » Wed, Apr 28, 2021, 12:32 PM UTC

> Where gRPC needs improvement: Let’s just get out here and say what not enough people are saying—in a nutshell, gRPC has feature creep, bloat and is trying to solve too many problems. It’s overcomplicated and has become a dumping ground of features, tangled in a standards body-based web of crap.

It sounds like they deemed more cost-effective to rewrite the protocol than learning how to use `grpc.Dial`

Re: DRPC, a Replacement for gRPC

#3

Post by jessuvius » Wed, Apr 28, 2021, 4:09 PM UTC

taklimakan wrote: post #2

> Where gRPC needs improvement: Let’s just get out here and say what not enough people are saying—in a nutshell, gRPC has feature creep, bloat and is trying to solve too many problems. It’s overcomplicated and has become a dumping ground of features, tangled in a standards body-based web of crap. It sounds like they deemed more cost-effective to rewrite the protocol than learning how to use `grpc.Dial`

I imagine they would need to know how to use the protocol in the first place if they're re-writing it, right? :)